The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Renewing Democracy in Young America
Abstract
This book suggests that youth civic development should be promoted by providing young people with opportunities to participate in community life. make four arguments. The first of these is that youth can be part of the solution to the problems of contemporary American democracy. The book then summarizes what political scientists say about contemporary politics and the systemic ills that have allowed ideological polarization to stymie the democratic process. Civic education must be located in the political context in which it occurs. This is because citizen participation reflects the political system and is not a consequence of citizens’ immutable characteristics. We must supply young people with opportunities. Our second argument is that civic development and civic education will not be improved by more of what we are already doing. There is scant evidence that schools successfully inculcate civic knowledge in students. There is also little evidence of the efficacy of state-mandated community service as a requirement for high school graduation. The third argument is that improving civic development will require new opportunities for youth participation in the community and in the electorate. We propose that civic education be enriched by science-based, community-oriented environmental engagement and by lowering the voting age for municipal elections to 16. Finally, we argue that now is the time to take steps to facilitate civic development. The problems of youth engagement will neither resolve on their own nor be cured by foreseeable changes in social media technologies, federal politics, or generational change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Political engagement and wellbeing among college students
Ballard, P. J., Ni, X., & Brocato, N. (2020) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101209 · Cited by 61
Unfiltered and unapologetic: March for our lives and the political boundaries of age
Bent, E. (2019) · Jeunesse Young People Texts Cultures · doi:10.1353/jeu.2019.0017 · Cited by 20
Maslowsky, J., Buss, E., & Wray-Lake, L. (2024) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101435 · Cited by 8
“Even if there were consensus on the importance of certain capacities such as political knowledge for voting, there are numerous ways to measure political knowledge, and adolescents ’ and adults ’ assessed competencies vary depending on which measurement is adopted (Hart and Youniss, 2018).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, D., & Youniss, J.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Catholic University of America (US)
- ORCID
- Hart, Daniel
- Venue
- Oxford Scholarship Online
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2017-12-21
- OpenAlex
- W2894109530
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Citizenship Education and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth, Politics, and Society
- Keywords
- citizenship education, youth political participation, American democracy, ideological polarization, environmental engagement, voting age lowering, local elections, youth voter turnout, civic knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renewing Democracy in Young America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780190641481.001.0001
- The paper
- Hart, D., & Youniss, J. (2017). Renewing Democracy in Young America. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190641481.001.0001