The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mind Cure: How Meditation Became Medicine
Abstract
Mindfulness is widely claimed to improve health and performance, and historians typically say that efforts to promote meditation and yoga therapeutically began in the 1970s. In fact, they began much earlier, and that early history offers important lessons for the present and future. This book traces the history of mind-body medicine from eighteenth-century Mesmerism to the current Mindfulness boom and reveals how religion, race, and gender have shaped events. Many of the first Americans to advocate meditation for healing were women leaders of the Mind Cure movement, which emerged in the late nineteenth century. They believed that by transforming their consciousness, they could also transform oppressive circumstances in which they lived, and some were activists for social reform. Trained by Buddhist and Hindu missionaries, these women promoted meditation through personal networks, religious communities, and publications. Some influenced important African American religious movements, as well. For women and black men, Mind Cure meant not just happiness but liberation in concrete political, economic, and legal terms. The Mind Cure movement exerted enormous pressure on mainstream American religion and medicine, and in response, white, male doctors and clergy with elite academic credentials appropriated some of its methods and channeled them into scientific psychology and medicine. As mental therapeutics became medicalized, individualized, and then commodified, the religious roots of meditation, like the social justice agendas of early Mind Curers, fell away. After tracing how we got from Mind Cure to Mindfulness, this book reveals what got lost in the process.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Concurrently, historians and scholars of religious studies have argued that meditation needs to be understood as a contextual and social practice.”
From “I was trying to save the world”: delusion-like ideation and associated impacts reported by Western practitioners of Buddhist meditation (2025) · cites this paper as Hickey, 2019
In the citing paper
“These include Theosophy (Hammer 2013), itself emerging from Hindu and esoteric Buddhist sources, and New Thought, its own precursors including Mesmerism (Albanese 1992), which from early on focused on healing (Hickey 2019).”
From New Age Healing: Origins, Definitions, and Implications for Religion and Medicine (2022) · cites this paper as Hickey 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Age Healing: Origins, Definitions, and Implications for Religion and Medicine
Levin, J. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13090777 · Cited by 12
Terms Of Engagement: Text, Technique And Experience In Scholarship On Theravada Meditation
Skilton, A., Crosby, K., & Kyaw, P. P. (2019) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2019.1666342 · Cited by 5
Solomonova, E., Lindahl, J. R., Gold, I., Cooper, D. J., Little, C., Arteca, D., Cao, C., & Britton, W. B. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1644684 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hickey, W. S.
- Corresponding author
- Hickey, Wakoh Shannon
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2019-03-21
- OpenAlex
- W4239566758
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- mindfulness, meditation, mind-body medicine, mesmerism, women religious leaders, African American religious movements, Buddhism, Hinduism, missionaries, medicalization, social reform, race and religion, gender and healing, history of psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review