Reconstructing the Temple: The Royal Rhetoric of Temple Renovation in the Ancient Near East and Israel
Abstract
This book examines temple renovation as a distinct topos within royal literature of the ancient Near East. Unlike newly founded temples, which were celebrated for their novelty, temple renovations were oriented toward the past. Kings took the opportunity to rehearse the history of the temple, selectively evoking certain past traditions and omitting others. In this way, temple renovations are a kind of historiography. The particularities of each case notwithstanding, this book demonstrates a pattern in the rhetoric of temple renovation texts; namely, kings used temple renovation to correct, or at least distance themselves from, some turmoil of recent history and to associate their reigns with an earlier and more illustrious past. The main evidence for this royal rhetoric comes from royal literature of the seventh and sixth centuries bce. This evidence in turn becomes the basis for reading the story of Jeroboam I’s placement of calves at Dan and Bethel (1 Kgs 12:25–33) as an eighth-century bce account of temple renovation with a similar rhetoric. Concluding with further examples in the Hellenistic and Roman periods, this book shows that the rhetoric of temple renovation was not just a distinct topos, but also a long-standing one in the ancient Near East.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The aspect of specific chronological information regarding elapsed years, or the chronological and historical implications of this segment of those texts, has been largely ignored.
“unfortunately, the aspect of specific chronological information regarding elapsed years, or the chronological and historical implications of this segment of those texts, has been largely ignored”
From Temple Dedication and Construction Texts of the Ancient Near East with Elapsed Years: Implications for Long Duration Chronologies (2024) · cites this paper as Davis 2019, pp. 5-154
A temple dedication and construction genre, as it relates to long-duration years and historical chronology in the context of ancient Near Eastern archaeology, history, and religion, has only been discussed in limited scope.
“A temple dedication and construction genre, as it relates to long-duration years and historical chronology in the context of ancient Near Eastern archaeology, history, and religion, has only been discussed in limited scope.”
From Temple Dedication and Construction Texts of the Ancient Near East with Elapsed Years: Implications for Long Duration Chronologies (2024) · cites this paper as Davis 2019, pp. 5-154
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Davis, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davis, Andrew R.
- ORCID
- Davis, Andrew R.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2019-08-22
- OpenAlex
- W4252135474
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- temple renovation, royal rhetoric, historiography, topos, temple history, Hellenistic period, Roman period, kingship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review