The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Abstract
Interrupted Time Series Analysis develops a comprehensive set of models and methods for drawing causal inferences from time series. Example analyses of social, behavioural, and biomedical time series illustrate a general strategy for building A uto R egressive Integrated M oving A verage ( ARIMA ) impact models. The classic Box-Jenkins-Tiao model-building strategy is supplemented with recent auxiliary tests for transformation, differencing and model selection. New developments, including Bayesian hypothesis testing and synthetic control group designs are described and their prospects for widespread adoption are discussed. Example analyses make optimal use of graphical illustrations. Mathematical methods used in the example analyses are explicated assuming only exposure to an introductory statistics course. Design and Analysis of Time Series Experiments (DATSE) and other appropriate authorities are cited for formal proofs. Forty completed example analyses are used to demonstrate the implications of model properties. The example analyses are suitable for use as problem sets for classrooms, workshops, and short-courses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interrupted time series is a quasi-experimental design used to measure the causal effect of an intervention by controlling for confounds.
“ITS is a quasi-experimental study adopted as an alternative to randomized control trial research designs, typically used to measure the causal effect of an intervention, by controlling for confounds, and primarily through its control over regression to the mean.”
From Impacts of school shooter drills on the psychological well-being of American K-12 school communities: a social media study (2021) · cites this paper as McDowall et al., 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers
Peng, H., Romero, D. M., & Horvát, E.-Á. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2119086119 · Cited by 57
ElSherief, M., Saha, K., Gupta, P., Mishra, S., Seybolt, J., Xie, J., O’Toole, M., Burd-Sharps, S., & De Choudhury, M. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00993-6 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- McDowall, D., McCleary, R., & Bartos, B. J.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2019-10-24
- OpenAlex
- W4285781714
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Keywords
- interrupted time series, causal inference, model selection, Bayesian hypothesis testing, biomedical time series
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review