The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grounded Normative Theory
Open accessAbstract
This chapter offers a way of studying deliberative democracy from an Engaged or Grounded Normative Theory (GNT) approach that blends empirical study with normative theorizing recursively, inclusively, accountably, and solidaristically. The GNT proposed in this chapter is intended to provide inspiration to deliberative democrats to develop their critical muscles and to ensure that deliberative democracy remains relevant to addressing pressing political issues, including racialized injustice and oppression. Upon outlining the basic contours of GNT as a broad field, I discuss its more specifically solidaristic expression. I then draw from my own application of solidaristic GNT methodology and offer two suggestions to encourage deliberative democrats to adopt this methodology and conduct research in ways that are in solidarity with groups, communities, and nations seeking justice as they define it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Normative principles are then generated and refined through recursive engagement with existing normative frameworks and the empirical context from which they theorize (Ackerly et al., 2024; Johnson, 2022).”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Johnson, 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“GNT is a methodology that orients settler theorists more explicitly towards these tasks.”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Johnson, 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Ackerly and colleagues characterize GNT as united by methodological commitments to comprehensiveness, recursivity, epistemological inclusion, and epistemic accountability (2024; see also Johnson, 2022).”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Johnson, 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grounded Normativity / Place-Based Solidarity
Coulthard, G., & Simpson, L. B. (2016) · American Quarterly · doi:10.1353/aq.2016.0038 · Cited by 525
Everyday decolonization: living a decolonizing queer politics
Hunt, S., & Holmes, C. (2015) · Journal of Lesbian Studies · doi:10.1080/10894160.2015.970975 · Cited by 235
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 2008, Universal Human Rights in a World of Difference
- 2018, Just Responsibility: A Human Rights Theory of Global Justice
- 2021, ‘Unearthing Grounded Normative Theory: Practices and Commitments of Empirical Research in Political Theory’., Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
- 2020, ‘Disabled Lives in Deliberative Systems’., Political Theory
- 2021, ‘Gender Difference in Willingness and Capacity for Deliberation’., Social Politics
- 1990, Reckoning Schemes of Legitimation: On Commissions of Inquiry as Power/Knowledge Forms, Journal of Historical Sociology
- 2017, Buried in the Heart: Women, Complex Victimhood and the War in Northern Uganda
- 2018, Deliberative Democracy Now: LGBT Equality and the Emergence of Large-Scale Deliberative Systems
- 2020, The Humble Cosmopolitan: Rights, Diversity, and Trans-State Democracy
- 1996, Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse
- 2015, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
- 2014, Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition
- 2017, ‘Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research’., Daedalus
- 1990, Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science
- 2000, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations
- 2017, ‘From Polarisation to Pluralisation: A Deliberative Approach to Illiberal Cultures’., International Political Science Review
- 2015, ‘The Reach of Deliberative Democracy’., Policy Studies
- 1991, Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform
- Forman, Fonna. 2018. ‘Social Norms and the Cross-Border Citizen: From Adam Smith to Antanas Mockus’. In Cultural Agents Reloaded: The Legacy of Antanas Mockus, edited by Carlo Tognato, pp. 333–356. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Forman, Fonna, and Teddy Cruz. 2018. ‘Urban Rights as Collective Practice’. In Invisible Resources / Resources Invisibles, edited by Marie-Hélène Contal and Jana Revedin, pp. 42–56. Paris: Gallimard.
- 2005, ‘Deliberation before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World’., Political Theory
- 2006, ‘Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance’., Public Administration Review
- 2020, Afterword: Does Deliberative Democracy Have a Role in Our Time of Political Crisis?, Journal of Deliberative Democracy
- 2003, Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Government
- 2005, The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century
- 1996, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
- 2019, ‘Deliberative Democracy as a Critical Theory’., Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
- 2006, ‘Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society’s Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy’., Political Studies
- 2015, Democratic Illusion: Deliberative Democracy in Canadian Public Policy
- Johnson, Genevieve Fuji. 2020. ‘Revelatory Protest, Deliberative Exclusion, and the B.C. Missing Women Commission of Inquiry: Bridging the Micro/Macro Divide’. In Creating Spaces of Engagement, edited by Leah Levac and Sarah Wiebe, pp. 25–46. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. · DOI
- Johnson, Genevieve Fuji, and Kerry Porth. forthcoming/in production. “Sex worker rights are human rights: an approach to solidaristic normative theory,” International Feminist Journal of Politicshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2022.2075424 · DOI · Paper page
- 2011, Decolonizing Democracy: Transforming the Social Contract in India
- 2006, The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China
- 1980, Beyond Adversary Democracy
- 2008, ‘Representation and Deliberation in Civil Society’., Brazilian Political Science Review
- 2011, ‘The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Minipublics’., Politics and Society
- 2012, Forsaken: The Report of the Missing Women Commission of Inquiry Executive Summary
- 2006, Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy
- 2008, Deliberative Freedom: Deliberative Democracy as Critical Theory
- 2009, ‘Dissent, Criticism, and Transformative Political Action in Deliberative Democracy’., Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
- 2006, Playing with Fire: Feminist Thought and Activism through Seven Lives in India
- 2007, ‘Political Solidarity and Violent Resistance’., Journal of Social Philosophy
- 2008, Political Solidarity
- 2012, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes
- 2002, ‘Foundations of Black Solidarity: Collective Identity or Common Oppression’., Ethics
- 2015, Islands of Decolonial Love: Stories and Songs
- 2016, ‘Indigenous Resurgence and Co-resistance’., Critical Ethnic Studies
- 2017, As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance
- 2009, Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation
- 1998, ‘Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy’., Politics and Society
- Tenove, Christopher. 2020. ‘International Criminal Justice and the Empowerment or Disempowerment of Victims’. In Power in International Criminal Justice, edited by Morten Bergsmo, Mark Klamberg, Kjersti Lohne and Christopher B. Mahony, pp. 713–748. Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher.
- 2012, ‘Beyond the Empirical-Normative Divide: The Democratic Theory of Jane Mansbridge’., PS
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory
Jourdeuil, K. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423924000416 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, G. F.
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Genevieve Fuji
- Venue
- Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2022-10-25
- Pages
- 52-65
- OpenAlex
- W4309372607
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 26.63
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Funders
- University of Oxford
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
- Keywords
- deliberative democracy, oppression, justice, research methodology, inclusivity, accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
