The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Psychiatric Mental Status Examination
Abstract
Developed from years of teaching psychiatry to medical students and residents, this comprehensive text meets a need in the teaching of literature and will be valuable to both students first learning about the MSE and seasoned clinicians seeking an informative reference. The clinical relevance of mental status abnormalities is illustrated through frequent examples of disorders that can cause the particular signs and symptoms defined in each chapter. A final chapter describing fictional case histories with hypothetical examples of written mental status reports will be particularly useful for those learning to write such reports. This text is an important addition to the libraries of students and practitioners who work with psychiatric patients and should help to simplify and organize a challenging task.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They successfully showed a distinct set of predictive features that could accurately separate participants with schizophrenia from healthy controls in all of the language analysis categories.”
From A Review of Automated Speech and Language Features for Assessment of Cognitive and Thought Disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“However, when using a combination of features and various machine learning classifiers (random forest and support vector machine), they found that utilizing a combination of the semantic and pragmatic features led to the most promising accuracy (81.7%) in classification of control participants and those with schizophrenia.”
From A Review of Automated Speech and Language Features for Assessment of Cognitive and Thought Disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy, 2nd ed.
Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. E. (2005) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11214-000 · Cited by 344
Arciniegas, D. B., Adler, L. E., Topkoff, J. L., Cawthra, E. M., Filley, C. M., & Reite, M. L. (1999) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/026990599121827 · Cited by 155
Hippocampal volume varies with educational attainment across the life-span
Noble, K. G., Grieve, S. M., Korgaonkar, M. S., Engelhardt, L. E., Griffith, E. Y., Williams, L. M., & Brickman, A. M. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00307 · Cited by 154
Reconsidering Emotion Dysregulation
D’Agostino, A., Covanti, S., Monti, M. R., & Starčević, V. (2017) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-017-9499-6 · Cited by 183
Kim, T., Jeong, G., Baek, H.-S., Kim, G.-W., Sundaram, T., Kang, H., Lee, S.-W., Kim, H. J., & Song, J. (2010) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.025 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Trzepacz, P. T., & Baker, R. W.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 1993-08-19
- OpenAlex
- W594724138
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- psychiatric assessment, mental illness, psychiatry teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
