God at War: Power in the Exodus Tradition
Abstract
Dozeman examines Israel's changing views of divine power through an interpretation of plot and character in the Exodus story. He makes it clear that the exercise of divine power in holy war is not a static concept in Israel's theological reflection, but one open to critical evaluation and dynamic reformulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
M1 clearly demonstrates the power difference between YHWH and Pharaoh from the outset.
“As I have shown in the previous section, M1 clearly demonstrates the power difference between YHWH and Pharaoh from the outset (Dozeman 1996, p. 116).”
From The Journey through the Netherworld and the Death of the Sun God: A Novel Reading of Exodus 7–15 in Light of the Book of Gates (2023) · cites this paper as Dozeman 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, S. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14030343 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dozeman, T. B.
- Corresponding author
- Dozeman, Thomas B
- ORCID
- Dozeman, Thomas B
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 1996-09-05
- OpenAlex
- W4388386668
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Keywords
- Exodus narrative, divine power, holy war, biblical narrative interpretation, character and plot, ancient Israelite religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
