Cited by 390Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East HistoryQur’anic Interpretation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation

Open access

Abstract

Positioned at the boundary of traditional biblical studies, legal history, and literary theory, Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation shows how the leglislation of Deuteromomy reflects the struggle of its authors to renew late seventh-century Judaean society. Seeking to defend their revolutionary vision during the neo-Assyrian crisis, the reformers turned to earlier laws, even when they disagreed with them, and revised them in such a way as to lend authority to their new understanding of God’s will. Passages that other scholars have long viewed as redundant, contradictory, or displaced actually reflect the attempt by Deuteronomy’s authors to sanction their new religious aims before the legacy of the past. Drawing on ancient Near Eastern law and informed by the rich insights of classical and medieval Jewish commentary, Levinson provides an extended study of three key passages in the legal corpus: the unprecedented requirement for the centralization of worship, the law transforming the old Passover into a pilgrimage festival, and the unit replacing traditional village justice with a professionalized judiciary. He demonstrates the profound impact of centralization upon the structure and arrangement of the legal corpus, while providing a theoretical analysis of religious change and cultural renewal in ancient Israel. The book’s conclusion shows how the techniques of authorship developed in Deuteronomy provided a model for later Israelite and post-biblical literatur…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780195112801.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deuteronomy appears to reinterpret a number of laws found in Exodus, including those concerning the altar.

    “Deuteronomy appears to reinterpret a number of laws found in Exodus, including those concerning the altar.”

    From New Approaches to Commentary Formation in Ancient Mesopotamia (2021) · cites this paper as Levinson 1997: 28-36

  • The altar laws of Deut. 12:13-15 rework the altar laws from Exod. 20:24-26.

    “The altar laws of Deut. 12:13-15 rework the altar laws from Exod. 20:24-26 [MT 20:20-22].”

    From New Approaches to Commentary Formation in Ancient Mesopotamia (2021) · cites this paper as Levinson 1997: 28-36

  • The Deuteronomic authors employ many of the same lexemes as Exod. 20:24-26 to reinterpret, subvert, and retroject the idea of a cultically central altar upon an originally diffuse sacrificial system.

    “The Deuteronomic authors do much more than alter the law in Exod. 20:24-26; they employ many of the same lexemes as Exod. 20:24-26 in order to reinterpret, subvert, and retroject the idea of a cultically central altar upon an originally diffuse sacrificial system.”

    From New Approaches to Commentary Formation in Ancient Mesopotamia (2021) · cites this paper as Levinson 1997: 33

  • The idea of inner-biblical exegesis is predicated upon a text that is authoritative but not yet immutable, so that additions can be made that explain or rework the text.

    “Indeed, the idea of inner-biblical exegesis is predicated upon a text that is authoritative but not yet immutable, so that additions can be made that explain or rework the text in question.”

    From New Approaches to Commentary Formation in Ancient Mesopotamia (2021) · cites this paper as Levinson 1997

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Levinson, B. M.
Corresponding author
Levinson, Bernard M
Published
1997-10-23
OpenAlex
W1967845401
Cited by
390
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.02
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
Keywords
Deuteronomy, legal innovation, editorial history, Passover, pilgrimage festivals, judiciary, village justice, religious change, intertextuality, authorship, Covenant Code, ancient Near Eastern law, Israelite religion, Pentateuch, canon theory, biblical law, literary theory, critical legal studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review