The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Oxford Handbook of Memory
Abstract
Due to the advent of neuropsychology, it has become clear that there is a multiplicity of memory systems or, at the very least, of dissociably different modes of processing memory in the brain. As the Oxford Handbook of Memory demonstrates, the frontier of memory research has been enriched by breakthroughs of the last decades, with lines of continuity and important departures, and it will continue to be enriched by changes in technology that will propel future research. In turn, such changes are beginning to impact the legal and professional therapeutic professions and will have considerable future significance in realms outside of psychology and memory research. Endel Tulving and Fergus Craik, two world-class experts on memory, provide this handbook as a roadmap to the huge and unwieldy field of memory research. By enlisting an eminent group of researchers, they are able to offer insight into breakthroughs for the work that lies ahead. The outline is comprehensive and covers such topics as the development of memory, the contents of memory, memory in the laboratory and in everyday use, memory in decline, the organization of memory, and theories of memory.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Evidence from several studies on episodic memory in humans describes a symmetrical inverted U-shaped pattern of rising in childhood (3–4 years old) and declining in ageing”
From Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes (2010) · cites this paper as Tulving and Craik 2000
In the citing paper
“We contrasted the www-memory task with a memory task that required no temporal encoding and showed no dramatic changes in ability across the ages in humans”
From Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes (2010) · cites this paper as Tulving and Craik 2000
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950
De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.483 · Cited by 2,548
Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective
Squire, L. R. (2004) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.005 · Cited by 2,269
Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. S. N. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21029 · Cited by 2,143
The emergence of autobiographical memory: a social cultural developmental theory.
Nelson, K., & Fivush, R. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.2.486 · Cited by 1,609
Metadata
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2000-05-04
- OpenAlex
- W4388366620
- Cited by
- 1,340
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 13.85
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- memory systems, memory dissociation, memory development, memory content, memory decline, memory organization, memory theory, neuropsychology of memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Oxford Handbook of Memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780195122657.001.0001
- The paper
- The Oxford Handbook of Memory. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195122657.001.0001