The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Meaning, Misinterpretations, and Medicine: A cognitive Behavioral Approach to Understanding Health Anxiety and Hypochondriasis
Abstract
On an Internet bulletin board, someone reported that ‘‘my psychiatrist has just told me that I am suffering from DSM-IV.” As therapists and researchers working with the problems characterized by severe and persistent health anxiety, we also suffer from DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994), not least because it defines health anxiety as the somatoform disorder “Hypochondriasis.” This classification is theoretically misleading, as it diverts attention away from the importance of anxiety and therefore threat, and onto more superficial characteristics of the problem.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Dysfunctional health-related beliefs comprise of either disease conviction (i.e., the belief one has a feared illness or disease) and/or fear of contracting an illness or disease [40].”
From Illness Anxiety Disorder: A Review of the Current Research and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Salkovskis and Warwick’s [40] Cognitive-Behavioural Model of health anxiety identifies four types of dysfunctional beliefs central to health anxiety, including the perceived i) likelihood and ii) awfulness of experiencing a health problem, iii) the inability to cope with experiencing a health problem, and (iv) inadequacy of medical resources to treat a health problem [40, 41].”
From Illness Anxiety Disorder: A Review of the Current Research and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–102 of 102
Lemmo, D., Capasso, M., Martino, M. L., Donizzetti, A. R., Freda, M. F., & Caso, D. (2026) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2026.2731416
Forristal, K., Heugten, C. M. V., & Gillespie, D. C. (2026) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2026.2735355
Metadata
- Authors
- Salkovskis, P. M., & Warwick, H. M. C.
- Affiliations
- Warneford Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Salkovskis, Paul M
- Venue
- Hypochondriasis Modern Perspectives on an Ancient Malady
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Pages
- 202-222
- OpenAlex
- W15048986
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Keywords
- health anxiety, DSM-IV classification, somatoform disorders, cognitive-behavioral approach, threats, misinterpretation, psychiatric diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review