The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevention Effectiveness: A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic Evaluation
Abstract
As public accountability has increased and resources have become scarcer, public health, like clinical medicine, has been forced to re-examine the benefits and costs of its activities. Decision and economic analysis are basic tools in carrying out that mission. These methods have become standard practice in clinical medicine and health services research. This book, now in its second edition, was written in an effort to apply and adapt that experience to public health situations. The book was originally written to introduce Centers for Disease Control and Prevention staff to the concepts of decision and economic analysis, to provide guidance on methods to maximize comparability of studios, and to provide access to frequently used reference information. It has been adapted to meet the needs of scientists and managers in state and local health departments and managed care organizations as well as students in schools of public health and clinicians for an introductory text - a text that shows how these methods can be applied in population-based practice, to facilitate better comparability of studies, and to solidify understanding of the scientific basis for use of these tools in decision making. Decision makers will learn how these studies are conducted so they can be critical consumers, understanding the strengths and limitions, and apply findings to policy and practice. The second edition updates and expands upon the standard methodology for condcuting prevention effectiveness analyses. Each chapter has been revised or re-written. The chapters on measuring effectiveness, decision analysis, and making information useful for decision makers as well as several appendices are entirely new.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Economic Burden of Asthma in the United States, 2008–2013
Nurmagambetov, T., Kuwahara, R., & Garbe, P. L. (2018) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.201703-259oc · Cited by 842
Dube, S. R., Miller, J. W., Brown, D. W., Giles, W. H., Felitti, V. J., Dong, M., & Anda, R. F. (2006) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.06.006 · Cited by 698
Trickett, P. K., Noll, J. G., & Putnam, F. W. (2011) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579411000174 · Cited by 601
Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States
Corso, P., Finkelstein, E. A., Miller, T. R., Fiebelkorn, I. C., & Zaloshnja, E. (2006) · Injury Prevention · doi:10.1136/ip.2005.010983 · Cited by 479
Morgan, J., Meltzer, M. I., Plikaytis, B. D., Sofair, A. N., Huie-White, S., Wilcox, S., Harrison, L. H., Seaberg, E. C., Hajjeh, R. A., & Teutsch, S. M. (2005) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/502581 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2002-10-24
- OpenAlex
- W4388366699
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- prevention effectiveness, cost-effectiveness analysis, decision analysis, public health decision-making, health services research, study comparability, health policy, population-based prevention, health departments, managed care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review