The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Belmont Report
Abstract
The Belmont Report is a short document on moral principles that was published in 1978 by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (National Commission). Since that time it has provided a basic framework for analyzing ethical issues that arise during medical research in the United States and in many other countries.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We followed Menlo report [4] and Belmont report [6] in considering the ethical implications.”
From Understanding Users' Privacy Perceptions Towards LLM's RAG-based Memory (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Concept of Voluntary Consent
Nelson, R. M., Beauchamp, T. L., Miller, V. A., et al. (2011) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2011.583318 · Cited by 190
Self-citationRethinking the Belmont Report?
Friesen, P., Kearns, L., Redman, B. K., & Caplan, A. L. (2017) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2017.1329482 · Cited by 117
IRBs and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: Finding a Balance
Friesen, P., Gelinas, L. C., Kirby, A., Strauss, D. H., & Bierer, B. E. (2022) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2063434 · Cited by 82
Villar, S. S., Wason, J. M. S., & Bowden, J. (2015) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.12337 · Cited by 51
Namm, J. P., & Angelos, P. (2013) · Success in academic surgery · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4679-7_13 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Beauchamp, T. L.
- Corresponding author
- Beauchamp, Tom L
- Venue
- The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2008-04-18
- Pages
- 149-155
- OpenAlex
- W4388360441
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Keywords
- Belmont Report, research ethics, research participant protection, National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects, informed consent, research ethics principles, biomedical research ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
