Phylogeny of the Holometabolous Insects: The Most Successful Group of Terrestrial Organisms
Abstract
The radiation and diversification of the holometabolous insects stand as two of the grandest events in all of evolutionary history, representing an unprecedented explosion in species coupled with extensive anatomical and physiological specialization. The defining characteristic for Holometabola is complete metamorphosis: every insect in this group, with rare exception, passes through an egg, larval, pupal, and adult stage. This is in contrast to the non-holometabolous insect groups in which juveniles have more or less the same form as the adult, live in the same environment, and exploit similar resources. Although it has never been thoroughly tested, it is thought that the evolution of complete metamorphosis was the key innovation allowing these insects to partition habitats between adults and juveniles, resulting in a wider range of niches that could be occupied by the nascent species. And occupied they have. Holometabola includes well more than one million species representing roughly 80% of all described insect species and just more than half of the total number of described species on Earth today (Kristensen 1999, Wilson 1988). The immense size of this group and their unique morphological specializations present a serious challenge to phylogenetic systematics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Holometabolous insects are extremely successful in measures of abundance, ecological function or species richness.
“Whether relating to measures of abundance, ecological function or species richness, holometabolous insects are extremely successful (Whiting, 2004).”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Whiting, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis
MCMAHON, D. P., & HAYWARD, A. (2016) · Ecological Entomology · doi:10.1111/een.12313 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Whiting, M. F.
- Corresponding author
- Whiting, Michael F
- ORCID
- Whiting, Michael F
- Venue
- Assembling the Tree of Life
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2004-07-22
- Pages
- 345-361
- OpenAlex
- W4388363545
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
- Keywords
- Holometabola, insect phylogeny, complete metamorphosis, insect diversification, evolutionary innovation, habitat partitioning, insect taxonomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review