The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From Bilateral Symmetry to Pentaradiality: The Phylogeny of Hemichordates and Echinoderms
Abstract
Nested within the clade of bilaterally symmetrical animals, variously called the triploblasts or the bilaterians, lies a most unusual group. Although most bilaterians have a bilaterally symmetric body plan, with a clear anterior–posterior axis and in most cases a differentiated head region, the echinoderm adult is constructed on a pentaradiate plan and lacks an obvious anterior–posterior axis (e.g., figs. 22.1, 22.6, and 22.8). Yet echinoderms clearly start out life as bilateral organisms, and their peculiar body plan is a secondary modification that arises during the metamorphosis that transforms them from larva to adult. It is because echinoderms are so very different in appearance from their closest relatives, the hemichordates, that they provide a fascinating and important group for evolutionary and developmental studies. Based on their pattern of development, both echinoderms and their bilateral relatives the hemichordates clearly fall among the deuterostomes. Until comparatively recently, five major groups (Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Lophophorata, and Chaetognatha) were considered to be deuterostomes. However, molecular evidence now overwhelmingly suggests that only the echinoderms, hemichordates, and chordates belong together (Adoutte et al. 2000, Cameron et al. 2000, Giribet et al. 2000, Peterson and Eernisse 2001, Winchell et al. 2002).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Topological similarity strongly suggests homology within Ambulacraria but not homology between any other higher taxa.
“when it is, it strongly suggests homology, for example, within Ambulacraria (Peterson et al. 2000; Smith et al. 2004), but not homology between any other higher taxa (Ruppert 1991; Nielsen 2001).”
From The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records (2008) · cites this paper as Smith et al. 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peterson, K. J., Cotton, J. A., Gehling, J. G., & Pisani, D. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2233 · Cited by 313
Self-citationDistinguishing heat from light in debate over controversial fossils
Donoghue, P. C. J., & Purnell, M. A. (2009) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.200800128 · Cited by 160
PETERSON, K. J., SUMMONS, R. E., & DONOGHUE, P. C. J. (2007) · Palaeontology · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00692.x · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, A. B., Peterson, K. J., Wray, G., & Littlewood, D. T. J.
- Venue
- Assembling the Tree of Life
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2004-07-22
- Pages
- 365-383
- OpenAlex
- W2968708577
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Keywords
- hemichordates, Echinodermata, deuterostomes, Chordata, Lophophorata, chaetognaths, molecular phylogeny
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review