The Evolutionary Biology of Human Female Sexuality
Abstract
Research conducted over the last fifteen years has placed in question many of the traditional conclusions about the evolution of human female sexuality. Women have not lost estrus, as earlier researchers thought, but it is simply concealed, resulting in two functionally distinct sexualities with markedly different ends in each phase. At the fertile phase of the cycle, women prefer male traits that may mark superior genetic quality, and at infertile phases, they prefer men willing to invest resources in a mate. Thus, women’s peri-ovulatory sexuality functions to obtain a sire of superior genetic quality, and is homologous with estrus in other vertebrates. This model sheds light on male human sexuality as well: men perceive and respond to women’s estrus, including by increased mate guarding. Men’s response is limited, compared to other vertebrate males, implying coevolutionary history of selection on females to conceal estrus from men and selection on men to detect it. Research indicates that women’s concealed estrus is an adaptation to copulate conditionally with men other than the pair-bond partner. Women’s sexual ornaments-the estrogen-facilitated features of face and body-are honest signals of individual quality pertaining to future reproductive value.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Good looks are signals of phenotypic and genetic quality.
“Good looks are signals of phenotypic and genetic quality (Thornhill & Gangestad 2008).”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Thornhill & Gangestad 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000021 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Self-citationParasites, democratization, and the liberalization of values across contemporary countries
Thornhill, R., Fincher, C. L., & Aran, D. (2009) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2008.00062.x · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Self-citationThornhill, R., Fincher, C. L., Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2010) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491000800201 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationStandardized protocols for characterizing women’s fertility: A data-driven approach
Blake, K. R., Dixson, B. J. W., O'Dean, S. M., & Denson, T. F. (2016) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.03.004 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Males with obesity and overweight
Kim, K.-B., & Shin, Y.-A. (2020) · Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.7570/jomes20008 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W.
- ORCID
- Gangestad, Steven W
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2008-09-25
- OpenAlex
- W4388245672
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- female sexuality, human evolution, female fertility, mate choice, sexual ornaments, mate guarding, coevolution, sexual selection, honest signaling, pair bonding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review