Cited by 59History, Medicine, and LeadershipPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Strange Case of Donald J. Trump: A Psychological Reckoning

Abstract

The Strange Case of Donald J. Trump provides a coherent and nuanced psychological portrait of the 45th president of the United States. Drawing on biographical events in Trump’s life and on contemporary research and theory in personality, social, and developmental psychology, the book explores the personality traits and psychological dynamics that have shaped Trump’s life, with an emphasis on the strangeness of the case—how Trump again and again defies psychological expectations regarding what it means to be a human being. The book’s central thesis is that Donald Trump is the episodic man. He lives in the moment, outside of time, without an internal story to connect the discrete scenes in his life. As such, Trump perceives himself to be more like a superhero or a primal force, supernatural and timeless, rather than a flesh-and-blood human being with an inner life, a remembered past, and an imagined future. Trump’s psychological status as the episodic man helps us understand both Trump’s appeal (in the minds of millions) and his failings. The book’s interpretation of Trump sheds new light on Trump’s charisma, his deal-making, his volatile temperament, his approach to personal relationships, his narcissism, and his emergence as a new kind of authoritarian leader in American history.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780197507445.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The argument for the absence of a narrative identity in Trump's personality makeup draws from many different incidents in his life and many different sources.

    “The argument I make for the absence of a narrative identity in Trump's personality makeup draws from many different incidents in his life and many different sources (McAdams, 2020).”
  • Trump has no narrative identity at all, or at best a starkly depleted one.

    “In The Strange Case of Donald J. Trump: A Psychological Reckoning (McAdams, 2020), I argue that Trump has no narrative identity at all, or at best, he has a starkly depleted one.”
  • Trump has no story; he has never constructed an inner narrative, redemptive or otherwise, to make sense of his life in time.

    “The story for President Donald J. Trump could not be more different, for Trump has no story. Whereas Bush ultimately found himself to be trapped in his own highly redemptive life narrative, Trump has never constructed an inner narrative redemptive or otherwise to make sense of his life in time.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McAdams, D. P.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
McAdams, Dan P.
Published
2020-03-16
OpenAlex
W4239366574
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5
FWCI
11.14
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › History, Medicine, and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Donald Trump, personality traits, narcissism, charisma, authoritarian leadership, political psychology, negotiation, interpersonal relationships, political appeal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review