The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Machinery of Government: Public Administration and the Liberal State
Abstract
Political theorists are aware that the old-fashioned model of state power, according to which elected officials make policy decisions, which are then faithfully enacted by a loyal cadre of public servants, is hopelessly outdated. The complexity of the modern state, not to mention the difficulty of the economic and social problems it confronts, is such that a great deal of rule-making power is delegated to public servants. Yet if public servants are not merely in the business of administration, but are also deciding questions of policy, how are they making these decisions, and what normative principles inform their judgments? The Machinery of Government attempts to answer this question. The central challenge involves reconciling the tension between the traditional commitment to political neutrality on the part of the civil service with the fact that administrative discretion inevitably involves making normative judgments. State employees are in many cases unable to do their jobs effectively without some conception of where the public interest lies. It seems inevitable that this will conflict with the commitment to political neutrality, since this conception of the public interest may be tension with that of elected officials. The solution to the dilemma lies in an understanding of the constraints that liberalism imposes on popular sovereignty in a liberal-democratic polity. Not only do courts play an important role in checking the power of democratic publics, the executive bra…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The rise of authoritarian and populist political movements shows inexorably where the weakness of the liberal democratic state vis-a-vis rising levels of illiberal populism lies: the principle of neutrality (Heath, 2020; Rosanvallon, 2011).”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Heath, 2020
In the citing paper
“Finally, it is important to emphasize that the oath that bureaucrats take is to display ' fidelity to the law ' (Selznick, 1992), and defend the constitution, not the government of the day (Heath, 2020; Rosanvallon, 2011).”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Heath, 2020
In the citing paper
“Not only do bureaucracies transform democratic values into societal values during the process of administrative implementation; a bureaucracy also upholds norms of impartiality, neutrality, effectiveness, and expertise.”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Heath, 2020
In the citing paper
“He continues that in the ultimate case, ' this means that the executive may be called upon to serve as the countermajoritarian check on the legislature. '”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Heath (2020)
In the citing paper
“Heath (2020: 345) argues ' that the executive branch -and more specifically, the class of permanent officials -is also the custodian of these basic liberal principles. '”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Heath (2020)
Citations
Cited by
The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding
Yesilkagit, K., Bauer, M., Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2024) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13808 · Cited by 112
Bauer, M. W. (2025) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.70028 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Heath, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Heath, Joseph
- ORCID
- Heath, Joseph
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2020-08-20
- OpenAlex
- W4237008288
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
- Social Sciences › Law › Administrative Law and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- administrative discretion, civil service, political neutrality, public interest, rulemaking, liberalism, popular sovereignty, executive branch, liberal democracy, normative judgment, separation of powers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.