Cited by 4Medicine, History, and PhilosophyHistory of Science and MedicineHistorical and modern epidemiology studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Medicine in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century

LOCK, STEPHEN·1997·Western Medicine

Abstract

Every age has its medical sceptics-shrewd commentators whose analysis questions or even refutes the paradigm of the totally triumphalist view of med icine. These range from Moliere through George Bernard Shaw to Ivan Illich. Yet perhaps in our own day none has been so influential (certainly within med ical circles) as Thomas McKeown, whose critiques of medicine in the 1970s rested not only on exceptional academic rigour, but also on an insider’s know ledge, given his position as Professor of Social Medicine at the University of Birmingham.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780198205098.003.0008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
LOCK, S.
Corresponding author
LOCK, STEPHEN
Venue
Western Medicine
Published
1997-06-12
Pages
123-144
OpenAlex
W4388127932
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Historical and modern epidemiology studies
Keywords
history of medicine, 20th century medicine, critique of medicine, social medicine, Ivan Illich, George Bernard Shaw

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review