Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 57Australian Indigenous Culture and HistoryArt, Aesthetics, and PerceptionIndigenous Cultures and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From Dull to Brilliant: The Aesthetics of Spiritual Power among the Yolngu

Morphy, Howard·1992·Anthropology Art and Aesthetics

Abstract

In this essay I shall consider aspects of the aesthetics of Yolngu art. I am concerned primarily with a category of painting produced by men, but I place my analysis in the broader framework of the aesthetics of Yohigu ritual.1 The Yolngu are an Australian Aboriginal people, renowned in the anthropological literature as the Murngin, who live in north-east Arnhem Land, a coastal area of northern Australia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780198277330.003.0009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 57

Metadata

Authors
Morphy, H.
Corresponding author
Morphy, Howard
Venue
Anthropology Art and Aesthetics
Published
1992-09-24
Pages
181-208
OpenAlex
W4388358997
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Australian Indigenous Culture and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
Yolngu art, aesthetics, spiritual power, Aboriginal art, ritual, Arnhem Land

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.