The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Knots and Quantum Gravity
Abstract
In the mid-1980's, Abhay Ashtekar discovered a reformulation of general relativity in terms of what are now called the "new variables". This led to a rapid series of developments, and in 1990 Carlo Rovelli and Lee Smolin published a paper entitled "Loop representation of quantum general relativity", in which, among other things, it was shown that there is a space of solutions to the constraint equations of quantum gravity consisting of link invariants. The discovery of relations between quantum gravity and the theory of knots and links came as quite a surprise, since the topics had been regarded as quite remote from each other. This volume is the proceedings of a workshop held in 1993 at the University of California at Riverside. The purpose of the workshop was to bring together researchers in knot theory and quantum gravity and form more bridges between the two subjects. Most of the talks were given by researchers whose work has significance for both subjects. This volume contains expository papers as well as new results, and should serve as a guide for mathematicians and physicists seeking to understand this rapidly developing area of research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In string theory, the contribution of each surface to the sum is given by the area of the surface, and therefore it depends on a fixed background metric on the manifold.”
From “Sum over surfaces” form of loop quantum gravity (1997) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Background independent quantum gravity: a status report
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/r01 · Cited by 1,951
Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00150-q · Cited by 1,365
Projective techniques and functional integration for gauge theories
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531037 · Cited by 388
Geometry eigenvalues and the scalar product from recoupling theory in loop quantum gravity
De Pietri, R., & Rovelli, C. (1996) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.2664 · Cited by 201
Four-dimensional BF theory as a topological quantum field theory
Baez, J. C. (1996) · Letters in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00398315 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1994-08-11
- OpenAlex
- W1676582196
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- quantum gravity, knot theory, link invariants, loop representation, Ashtekar variables, quantum general relativity, constraint equations, spin networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review