The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Systematics, geographic distribution, and some notes on the conservation status of the Callitrichidae
Abstract
The phylogeny and systematics of the New World marmosets and tamarins is still under considerable discussion, even at the family level (Rosenberger 1981; Ford 1986a; Vivo 1991), although the remarkable synthesis of Hershkovitz (1977) remains the baseline for all current research and investigation on the taxonomy and distributions of these animals. Sixteen years on, some new forms have been described and there is still controversy regarding the taxonomic status of, most particularly, the marmosets, genus Callithrix. Considerable new information is also available regarding geographic distributions. In this chapter, we provide accounts of the current opinions regarding taxonomic status along with a revision of the distributions and some notes on the conservation status of each of the 50 or so marmosets and tamarins recognized to date.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
C. penicillata is often found in sympatry with several other Callithrix species due to range alterations.
“C. penicillata is one species that is often found in sympatry with several other Callithrix species due to such range alterations (Rylands et al. 1993, 2009).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Rylands et al. 1993
The ranges of Callithrix species are largely allopatric, with some species contact occurring at species distribution borders, but historical species ranges are being altered due to habitat destruction and anthropogenic introductions.
“The ranges of Callithrix species are largely allopatric, with some species contact occurring at species distribution borders, but historical species ranges are being altered due to habitat destruction and anthropogenic introductions of marmoset species outside of their historical geographical bounds (Rylands et al. 1993, 2009).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Rylands et al. 1993
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Passamani, M., & Rylands, A. B. (2000) · Primates · doi:10.1007/bf02557459 · Cited by 64
Self-citationFuzessy, L. F., Silva, I. D. O., Malukiewicz, J., Silva, F. F. R., Pônzio, M. D. C., Boere, V., & Ackermann, R. R. (2014) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-014-9284-5 · Cited by 51
PASSAMANI, M., & RYLANDS, A. B. (2000) · Revista Brasileira de Biologia · doi:10.1590/s0034-71082000000200011 · Cited by 24
Self-citationGariglio, A. C. R. S., Boere, V., Malukiewicz, J., Abreu Fonseca, L., Calais, A., & Silva, I. O. (2021) · Journal of Medical Primatology · doi:10.1111/jmp.12518 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Rylands, A. B., Coimbra-Filho, & Mittermeier, R. A.
- Venue
- Marmosets and Tamarins
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1993-06-10
- Pages
- 11-77
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
