The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Protevangelium of James and the Creative Rewriting of Matthew and Luke
Abstract
The so-called Protevangelium of James is perhaps the most historically significant of all the non-canonical gospels. In prefacing its account of the birth of Jesus with an account of the birth and childhood of Mary, it has directly or indirectly shaped beliefs about the ‘holy family’ throughout Christian history. It is beyond doubt that the author is familiar with Matthew and Luke’s birth narratives and that he uses them extensively. Yet his use of source texts is seldom predictable, often creative, and almost always in the service of forging a compelling narrative that serves his idiosyncratic take on the tradition. The Protevangelium is a masterpiece of creative synthesis that reveres its source materials while being unafraid to plough its own furrow. This chapter investigates how the Protevangelium interprets and rewrites synoptic narratives, paying special attention to the author’s rewriting of the stories of the annunciation and the birth of Jesus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As noted by Vanden Eykel (2016, pp.11-12), the view of more recent scholarship is that the author of Prot.Jas knew Matthew, Luke, and John, but not necessarily Mark.”
From The Protevangelium of James in Papyrus Bodmer V: Titles, Genres, and Traditions in Transmission (2023) · cites this paper as Goodacre 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Protevangelium of James in Papyrus Bodmer V: Titles, Genres, and Traditions in Transmission
Fowler, K. A. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14050636 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodacre, M.
- Corresponding author
- Goodacre, Mark
- ORCID
- Goodacre, Mark
- Venue
- Oxford Scholarship Online
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2018-05-24
- OpenAlex
- W2803420770
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 11 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
- Keywords
- Protevangelium of James, apocryphal gospels, infancy narratives, Nativity of Jesus, Holy Family, creative rewriting, source criticism, Synoptic Gospels, Gospel of Matthew, Gospel of Luke, Annunciation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review