Cited by 14Biblical Studies and InterpretationMedieval Literature and HistoryHistorical and Linguistic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Protevangelium of James and the Creative Rewriting of Matthew and Luke

Goodacre, Mark·2018·Oxford Scholarship Online

Abstract

The so-called Protevangelium of James is perhaps the most historically significant of all the non-canonical gospels. In prefacing its account of the birth of Jesus with an account of the birth and childhood of Mary, it has directly or indirectly shaped beliefs about the ‘holy family’ throughout Christian history. It is beyond doubt that the author is familiar with Matthew and Luke’s birth narratives and that he uses them extensively. Yet his use of source texts is seldom predictable, often creative, and almost always in the service of forging a compelling narrative that serves his idiosyncratic take on the tradition. The Protevangelium is a masterpiece of creative synthesis that reveres its source materials while being unafraid to plough its own furrow. This chapter investigates how the Protevangelium interprets and rewrites synoptic narratives, paying special attention to the author’s rewriting of the stories of the annunciation and the birth of Jesus.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780198814801.003.0004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Goodacre, M.
Corresponding author
Goodacre, Mark
Venue
Oxford Scholarship Online
Published
2018-05-24
OpenAlex
W2803420770
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 11 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
Keywords
Protevangelium of James, apocryphal gospels, infancy narratives, Nativity of Jesus, Holy Family, creative rewriting, source criticism, Synoptic Gospels, Gospel of Matthew, Gospel of Luke, Annunciation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review