The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Renegotiating Public Value with Co-Production
Abstract
In the context of public sector organizations, the governance model for co-production could help to deliver better public services that fulfill the expectations of citizens, via crowdsourcing. This chapter considers how and why co-production is a valuable solution for producing public services, but also highlights the challenges that public sector organizations face when co-production is adopted without being customized for public sector service delivery. In the context of the public sector, co-production needs to be focused on public value creation and not on public service production processes. This subtle shift in focus allows us to discuss how and why adopting co-production models that are successful in the private sector cannot be applied directly to public sector organizations; instead they need to be tailored in the light of a better understanding of the requirements of public value creation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In recent years, there has been interest in understanding how open and collaborative digital platforms implemented at national, state and local government levels can deliver public value to citizens (Cordella et al., 2018; Yotawut, 2018).”
From Digital identity as a platform for improving refugee management (2021) · cites this paper as Cordella et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance
Dunleavy, P. (2005) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057 · Cited by 2,638
Cocreation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software1
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410417 · Cited by 794
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital identity as a platform for improving refugee management
Madon, S., & Schoemaker, E. (2021) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12353 · Cited by 70
“national, state and local government levels can deliver public value to citizens (Cordella et al., 2018; Yotawut, 2018).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cordella, A., Paletti, A., & Shaikh, M.
- Venue
- Oxford Scholarship Online
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2018-05-24
- OpenAlex
- W2610994310
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Keywords
- co-production, public value, public value creation, public governance, public service delivery, crowdsourcing, citizen participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renegotiating Public Value with Co-Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0008
- The paper
- Cordella, A., Paletti, A., & Shaikh, M. (2018). Renegotiating Public Value with Co-Production. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0008