The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computers and Society: Modern Perspectives
Abstract
The last century has seen enormous leaps in the development of digital technologies, and most aspects of modern life have changed significantly with their widespread availability and use. Technology at various scales - supercomputers, corporate networks, desktop and laptop computers, the internet, tablets, mobile phones, and processors that are hidden in everyday devices and are so small you can barely see them with the naked eye - all pervade our world in a major way. Computers and Society: Modern Perspectives is a wide-ranging and comprehensive textbook that critically assesses the global technical achievements in digital technologies and how are they are applied in media; education and learning; medicine and health; free speech, democracy, and government; and war and peace. Ronald M. Baecker reviews critical ethical issues raised by computers, such as digital inclusion, security, safety, privacy,automation, and work, and discusses social, political, and ethical controversies and choices now faced by society. Particular attention is paid to new and exciting developments in artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the issues that have arisen from our complex relationship with AI.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The breadth of ethical and societal impacts of GenAI in computing education is very wide.
“Yet, their breadth is very wide: cf. for example the computing ethical education framework developed by Martin et al. [227], and the broad range of topics concerning computers and society , classified by Baecker [30] under: Opportunities: computer applications; Risks: technological threats; Choices: challenges for society .”
From Navigating the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Generative AI in Higher Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Navigating the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Generative AI in Higher Computing Education
Mak, J., Nakatumba-Nabende, J., Clear, T., Clear, A., Abluwi, I., Andrei, O., Angeli, L., MacNeil, S., Oyelere, S. S., Hale Rattigan, M., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3760545.3783975 · Cited by 12
Sustainability, Ethics and Artificial Intelligence in Computing Education
Moore, S. J., & McCullagh, P. (2024) · 2024 35th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC) · doi:10.1109/issc61953.2024.10603347 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Baecker, R. M.
- Corresponding author
- Baecker, Ronald M.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2019-04-24
- OpenAlex
- W4233942879
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- digital technologies, computing and society, computer ethics, digital inclusion, cybersecurity, privacy, automation, artificial intelligence, machine learning, freedom of expression, democracy, government, war and peace, education and learning, media, mobile devices, internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review