Cited by 14Information Society and Technology TrendsEthics and Social Impacts of AICybernetics and Technology in Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Computers and Society: Modern Perspectives

Baecker, Ronald M.·2019·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

The last century has seen enormous leaps in the development of digital technologies, and most aspects of modern life have changed significantly with their widespread availability and use. Technology at various scales - supercomputers, corporate networks, desktop and laptop computers, the internet, tablets, mobile phones, and processors that are hidden in everyday devices and are so small you can barely see them with the naked eye - all pervade our world in a major way. Computers and Society: Modern Perspectives is a wide-ranging and comprehensive textbook that critically assesses the global technical achievements in digital technologies and how are they are applied in media; education and learning; medicine and health; free speech, democracy, and government; and war and peace. Ronald M. Baecker reviews critical ethical issues raised by computers, such as digital inclusion, security, safety, privacy,automation, and work, and discusses social, political, and ethical controversies and choices now faced by society. Particular attention is paid to new and exciting developments in artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the issues that have arisen from our complex relationship with AI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780198827085.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The breadth of ethical and societal impacts of GenAI in computing education is very wide.

    “Yet, their breadth is very wide: cf. for example the computing ethical education framework developed by Martin et al. [227], and the broad range of topics concerning computers and society , classified by Baecker [30] under: Opportunities: computer applications; Risks: technological threats; Choices: challenges for society .”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baecker, R. M.
Corresponding author
Baecker, Ronald M.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2019-04-24
OpenAlex
W4233942879
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
digital technologies, computing and society, computer ethics, digital inclusion, cybersecurity, privacy, automation, artificial intelligence, machine learning, freedom of expression, democracy, government, war and peace, education and learning, media, mobile devices, internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review