Poland's Constitutional Breakdown
Open accessAbstract
After its double victory in the 2015 presidential and parliamentary elections in Poland, the populist Law and Justice (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (PiS)) party began to dismantle all major checks and balances characteristic of the separation of powers in a democratic state. Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal, its regular courts including the Supreme Court, its National Council of the Judiciary, as well as its electoral commissions, civil service, and public media have all been subordinated to the executive and are single-handedly controlled by the party’s leader. In the process, political rights such as the freedom of assembly have been radically restricted, and the party has captured the entire state apparatus. The speed and depth of anti-democratic changes took many observers by surprise, as Poland had been widely regarded as an example of a successful ‘transitional democracy’ in the quarter century preceding 2015. This book attempts to answer three major questions triggered by Poland’s anti-constitutional breakdown: What exactly has happened? Why has it happened? What are the prospects of returning to liberal democracy? Answers to these questions are formulated against the backdrop of current worldwide trends towards populism, authoritarianism, and what is sometimes called ‘illiberal democracy’. However, as this book argues, the Polish variant of ‘illiberal democracy’ is an oxymoron. By undermining the separation of powers, the ruling party concentrates all power in one hand, thu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy
Huq, A. Z., & Ginsburg, T. (2017) · UCLA Law Review · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2901776 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Why is democracy performing so poorly?
Fukuyama, F. (2015) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0017 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Varieties of Illiberal Backlash in Central Europe
Guasti, P., & Bustikova, L. (2023) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2022.2156889 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“The pushback against minority rights, traditionally associated with ethnicity, is a warning sign of nascent illiberalism (Anders and Lorenz 2021; Sadurski 2019).”
BackgroundZalewski, F. (2021) · Faire, défaire la démocratie · doi:10.3917/kart.bonna.2021.01.0297 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sadurski, W.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sadurski, Wojciech
- ORCID
- Sadurski, Wojciech
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2019-05-16
- OpenAlex
- W2962090206
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 60.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- ReIn UW (University of Warsaw) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Polish Law and Legal System
- Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- Poland, Law and Justice party, illiberal democracy, separation of powers, checks and balances, populism, authoritarianism, Constitutional Tribunal, National Council of the Judiciary, freedom of assembly, democratic accountability, European Union intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review