CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 99Digital literacy in educationInformation Society and Technology TrendsGender and Technology in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internet Skills and Why They Matter

Hargittai, Eszter, Micheli, Marina·2019·Society and the Internet
DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198843498.003.0007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Given that the Internet is now ubiquitous in high-income nations, do Internet skills still matter? The authors of this chapter synthesize a body of research that shows how Internet skills, defined across ten dimensions, remain critical, especially as the technology becomes ever more significant and embedded into everyday life. Having the requisite skills to use the Internet and related social media is essential to avoid being excluded from key facets of society. This chapter demonstrates the need to build the study of skills into digital inequality scholarship that seeks to address concerns over online experiences tending to follow and reinforce socioeconomic inequalities. Complementing research by Quan-Haase, Zhang, Wellman, and Wang (Chapter 5, this volume), this chapter challenges stereotypes of young people being tech-savvy, showing that youth are not universally knowledgeable about digital tools and media.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780198843498.003.0007

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. 2013, Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know
  2. 2004, Learning Ecologies for Technological Fluency: Gender and Experience Differences,, Journal of Educational Computing Research
  3. 2008, “The ‘Digital Natives’ Debate: A Critical Review of the Evidence,, British Journal of Educational Technology
  4. Bradner, E. (2001). “Social Affordances of Computer-mediated Communication Technology: Understanding Adoption,” in Proceedings from CHI ’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 67–8. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634111. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  5. 2013, The Stress Potential of Social Media in the Workplace,, Information, Communication #amp; Society
  6. 2017, The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms,, Information, Communication #amp; Society
  7. 2016, Caring Is Not Enough: The Importance of Internet Skills for Online Privacy Protection,, Information, Communication #amp; Society
  8. 2015, Non-Participation in Digital Media: Toward a Framework of Mediated Political Action,, Media, Culture #amp; Society
  9. 2010, “The Participation Divide Among ‘Online Experts’: Experience, Skills and Psychological Factors as Predictors of College Students’ Web Content Creation,, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
  10. 2018, Digital inclusion through mobile phones?: A comparison between mobile-only and computer users in internet access, skills and use., Information, Communication #amp; Society
  11. De Choudhury, M., Morris, M. R., and White, R. W. (2014). “Seeking and Sharing Health Information Online: Comparing Search Engines and Social Media,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 1365–76. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557214. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI · Paper page
  12. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., and Schafer, S. (2004). “Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use,” in K. Neckerman (ed.), Social Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 355–400.
  13. Duffy, B. E., Pruchniewska, U., and Scolere, L. (2017). "Platform-Specific Self-Branding: Imagined Affordances of the Social Media Ecology," in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media #amp · DOI
  14. Society. New York: ACM, 5:1-5:9. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097291. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  15. 2000, The Problem of Information Overload in Business Organisations: A Review of the Literature,, International Journal of Information Management
  16. 2004, Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era,, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia
  17. 2004, Experiments in Digital Literacy,, Cyberpsychology #amp; Behavior
  18. Things Can Be Worse Than They Appear': Understanding Biased Algorithms and Users' Behavior Around Them in Rating Platforms," in The International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 62-71. Montreal. Available at https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15697. (Accessed March 21, 2019).
  19. Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vuong, A., Karahalios, K.,…Sandvig, C. (2015). “‘I Always Assumed That I Wasn’t Really That Close to [Her]’: Reasoning About Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 153–62. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702556. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  20. 2013, DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe
  21. 2010, The Politics of ‘Platforms’,, New Media #amp; Society
  22. 2014, Uneven Geographies of User-Generated Information: Patterns of Increasing Informational Poverty,, Annals of the Association of American Geographers
  23. 2011, The Digital Skills of Internet-Natives. The Role of Ascriptive Differences in the Possession of Different Forms of Digital Literacy in a Random Sample of Northern Italian High School Students,, New Media and Society
  24. 2017, ‘Digital Well-Being’: Developing a New Theoretical Tool For Media Literacy Research,, Italian Journal of Sociology of Education
  25. 2000, Open Portals or Closed Gates? Channeling Content on the World Wide Web,, Poetics
  26. 2002, Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills,, First Monday,
  27. Hargittai, E. (2007a). “A Framework for Studying Differences in People’s Digital Media Uses,” in N. Kutscher and H.-U. Otto (eds), Cyberworld Unlimited. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, 121–37. Available at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-531-90519-8_7.pdf. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  28. 2007, The Social, Political, Economic, and Cultural Dimensions of Search Engines: An Introduction,, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
  29. 2010, Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the ‘Net Generation’,, Sociological Inquiry
  30. 2016, ‘What Can I Really Do?’ Explaining the Privacy Paradox with Online Apathy,, International Journal of Communication
  31. 2012, Taming the Information Tide: Perceptions of Information Overload in the American Home,, The Information Society
  32. 2010, Trust Online: Young Adults’ Evaluation of Web Content,, International Journal of Communication
  33. 2012, Online Social Networking Skills: The Social Affordances Approach to Digital Inequality,, First Monday
  34. 2007, Bit Literacy: Productivity in the Age of Information and E-mail Overload
  35. 2000, Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters,, The Information Society
  36. 2017, Developing Digital Skills and Competences: A Quick-Scan Analysis of 13 Digital Literacy Models,, Italian Journal of Sociology of Education
  37. 2006, How Are We Searching the World Wide Web? A Comparison of Nine Search Engine Transaction Logs,, Information Processing and Management
  38. Johnson, I. L., Lin, Y., Li, T. J.-J., Hall, A., Halfaker, A., Schöning, J., and Hecht, B. (2016). “Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide,” in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 13–25. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858123. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  39. 2012, No A 4 U: The Relationship Between Multitasking and Academic Performance,, Computers #amp; Education
  40. 2016, ‘Self-Branding, ‘Micro-Celebrity’ and the Rise of Social Media Influencers,, Celebrity Studies
  41. 2018, “‘It’s Like Learning a Whole Other Language’: Algorithmic Skills in the Curation of Creative Goods., International Journal of Communication
  42. 2015, Intimacy and Social Capital on Facebook: Beyond the Psychological Perspective,, New Media #amp; Society
  43. 2009, Networked Publics: The Double Articulation of Code and Politics on Facebook,, Canadian Journal of Communication
  44. 2016, Online Harassment, Digital Abuse, and Cyberstalking in America, Report. Data #amp; Society Research Institute,
  45. 2012, Journal of Broadcasting #amp; Electronic Media
  46. Litt, E. and Hargittai, E. (2016). “‘Just Cast the Net, and Hopefully the Right Fish Swim into It’: Audience Management on Social Network Sites,” in Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. San Francisco, CA: ACM, 1488–500. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819933. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  47. 2014, Awkward Encounters of an ‘Other’ Kind: Collective Self-Presentation and Face Threat on Facebook.
  48. 2007, Gradations in Digital Inclusion: Children, Young People and the Digital Divide,, New Media #amp; Society
  49. 2017, The Dark Side of Online Participation: Exploring Non-, Passive and Negative Participation,, Information, Communication #amp; Society
  50. 2014, Beyond Just Politics: A Systematic Literature Review of Online Participation,, First Monday
  51. Lutz, C., Ranzini, G., and Meckel, M. (2014). “Stress 2.0: Social Media Overload Among Swiss Teenagers,” in L. Robinson, S. R. Cotton, and J. Schultz (eds), Communication and Information Technologies Annual, Vol. 8. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 3–24). Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020140000008001. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  52. 2017, Digital Skills Gaps: A Pending Subject for Gender Digital Inclusion in the European Union,, European Journal of Communication
  53. 2015, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age
  54. 2014, Networked Privacy: How Teenagers Negotiate Context in Social Media,, New Media #amp; Society
  55. 2016, Perpetual Contact as a Communicative Affordance: Opportunities, Constraints, and Emotions,, Mobile Media #amp; Communication
  56. Mendes Rodrigues, E. and Milic-Frayling, N. (2009). “Socializing or Knowledge Sharing? Characterizing Social Intent in Community Question Answering,” in Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 1127–36. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/1645953.1646096. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  57. 2003, Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment,, Communication Yearbook
  58. 123Micheli, M. (2015). “What is New in the Digital Divide? Understanding Internet Use by Teenagers from Different Social Backgrounds,” in L. Robinson, S. R. Cotton, and J. Schultz (eds), Communication and Information Technologies Annual, Vol. 10. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 55–87. Available at www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010003. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  59. Micheli, M., Redmiles, E. M., and Hargittai, E. (2019). "Help Wanted: Young Adults' Sources of Support for Questions about Digital Media," Information, Communication #amp · DOI
  60. Society, 0(0): 1-18. Available at: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1602666 (Accessed June 3, 2019). · DOI
  61. 2010, What Do People Ask Their Social Networks, and Why? A Survey Study of Status Message Q#amp;A Behavior.
  62. 2017, Three Guys Walk into a Bar: An Information Theoretic Analysis,, Information, Communication #amp; Society
  63. 2013, Performing for One’s Imagined Audience: Social Steganography and Other Privacy Strategies of Estonian Teens on Networked Publics,, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace,
  64. 2010, A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites
  65. 2013, Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online., Communication Research
  66. 2017, My News Feed is Filtered?, Digital Journalism
  67. Redmiles, E. M., Kross, S., and Mazurek, M. L. (2016). “How I Learned to be Secure: A Census-Representative Survey of Security Advice Sources and Behavior,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. Vienna: ACM, 666–77. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978307. (Accessed April 11, 2018). · DOI
  68. 2014, Freeways, Detours, and Dead Ends: Search Journeys Among Disadvantaged Youth,, New Media #amp; Society
  69. 2011, An Empirical Examination of the Educational Impact of Text Message-Induced Task Switching in the Classroom_ Educational Implications and Strategies to Enhance Learning,, Psicologia Educativa
  70. 2015, What Do You Need to Know to Use a Search Engine? Why We Still Need to Teach Research Skills,, AI Magazine
  71. 2011, The Digital Production Gap: The Digital Divide and Web 2.0 Collide,, Poetics
  72. 2004, Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide,, New Media #amp; Society
  73. 2018, The Pipeline of Online Participation Inequalities: The Case of Wikipedia Editing,, Journal of Communication
  74. 1997, Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut
  75. 2007, The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet
  76. 2017, Reconceptualizing Communication Overload and Building a Theoretical Foundation,, Communication Theory
  77. 2013, Deciding by Default,, University of Pennsylvania Law Review
  78. 2011, Internet skills and the Digital Divide,, New Media #amp; Society
  79. 2013, The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media
  80. 2003, Technology and Social Inclusion
  81. 2012, Examining the Impact of Off-Task Multi-Tasking with Technology on Real-Time Classroom Learning,, Computers #amp; Education

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 99

Metadata

Authors
Hargittai, E., & Micheli, M.
ORCID
Venue
Society and the Internet
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Published
2019-07-18
Pages
109-124
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198843498.003.0007
OpenAlex
W2974395257
Cited by
99
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5
FWCI
47.89
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
internet skills, digital inequality, digital divide, socioeconomic disparities, social media use, digital exclusion, digital inclusion, technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review