The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Phonology of Standard Chinese
Abstract
This is a new and revised edition of the title first published by OUP in 2000. From the reviews of the first edition: 'This book is a comprehensive study of the phonology of Standard Chinese. Not only is it rich in detailed and amazingly accurate factual description, it also proposes elegant theoretical solutions to many long-standing problems in Chinese phonology, such as word length variation, word order, and the application of the third tone sandhi. Another great strength of the book is that in every chapter, the generative literature on related issues is carefully reviewed. Therefore it can also serve as a great reference book for the past advances in Chinese generative phonology. Moreover, the book is written in a down-to-earth fashion and is very approachable by anyone with the slightest interest in Chinese languages or phonology but relatively little training in either area.' Jie Zhang, Linguist 'Because of its accessibility, this book can be used as an introductory textbook for Chinese phonology or Chinese linguistics.... Every phonologist and student of Chinese linguistics will find something valuable from the book because of its wealth of data and insightful analyses.' Yen-Hwei Lin, Phonology 'Explanations are based on a variety of perspectives, from traditional views of the phoneme to feature geometry and Optimality Theory, each concisely introduced so that the discussion easy to follow even for the novice. The result is a flowing, integrated approach that addresses - and solves - some of the thorniest perennial problems in Chinese phonology.... Because this user-friendly introduction offers innovative new solutions to old problems, it enjoys the rare distinction of succeeding both as an essential textbook of Standard Chinese phonology and as an important new theoretical advance in phonological analysis.' Edward J. Vajda, Language
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Chinese and English are highly contrasted in phonology, and many syllables and syllabic structures in English do not exist in Chinese (Chen et al., 2004; Duanmu, 2007 ).”
From Do word-level skills show cross-linguistic transfer and predict bilingual reading? (2026) · cites this paper as Duanmu, 2007
In the citing paper
“Chinese and English are highly contrasted in phonology, and many syllables and syllabic structures in English do not exist in Chinese (Chen et al., 2004; Duanmu, 2007 ).”
From Do word-level skills show cross-linguistic transfer and predict bilingual reading? (2026) · cites this paper as Duanmu, 2007
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, X., McMillen, S., & Shi, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1566442 · Cited by 3
Do word-level skills show cross-linguistic transfer and predict bilingual reading?
Xie, Q., & Yeung, S. S.-S. (2026) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-026-10767-8
Metadata
- Authors
- Duanmu, S.
- Corresponding author
- Duanmu, San
- ORCID
- Duanmu, San
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-10-18
- OpenAlex
- W1506507878
- Cited by
- 1,157
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 25.14
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Keywords
- Mandarin Chinese, word order, Optimality Theory, feature geometry, generative phonology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review