The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Legend Of Miaoshan Revised Edition
Abstract
In Chinese legend, the princess Miaoshan defied her father by refusing to marry, and pursued her austere religious vocation to the death, but returned to life to be his saviour and the saviour of all mankind. The story is inseparable from the female bodhisattva Guanyin, whose cult dominated religious life at all levels in traditional China and is still powerful in rural China today. Miaoshan herself became a lasting symbol of the tension in women’s lives between individual spiritual fulfilment and the imperatives of family duty. The previous edition of this book was the first full monograph on the subject. It deals with the story’s background, early history, and more developed later versions, bringing much of this material to the attention of modern readers for the first time. It analyses the basic sources, many of them in Buddhist scripture, and the overall pattern of development. It finally offers a range of interpretations which discover here myths of religious celibacy, of filial piety, and of ritual salvation of the dead. The legend of Miaoshan spans the uncertain boundaries between Chinese popular literature, theatre, and religion, and this book directly addresses students of those fields. But it holds a larger significance for those interested in the position of women in traditional society, and students of comparative literature and folklore will find here a version of the ‘King Lear’ story. This new edition takes account of epigraphical evidence, discovered and accessed since the time of first publication, which enriches and refines the discussion. This and other additional evidence, introduced for the sake of a more complete picture, leave the argument and conclusions of the original study still essentially intact.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The oldest known version of Miaoshan ' s story was recorded by Jiang Zhiqi 蔣 之 奇 (1031 -1104) (Dudbridge 2004: 5) in 1104.”
From Death and Demonization of a Bodhisattva: Guanyin's Reformulation within Chinese Religion (2016) · cites this paper as Dudbridge 2004: 5
In the citing paper
“The generic issue of ' revelation text ' and the theological issue of ' demonic spirit ' offer focal areas for comparison with three later versions, all from the Wanli reign (1573 -1620) of the Ming.”
From Death and Demonization of a Bodhisattva: Guanyin's Reformulation within Chinese Religion (2016) · cites this paper as Dudbridge 2004
In the citing paper
“The ' popular ' version is contained in a collection of hagiographies called Sanjiao yuanliu soushen daquan 三 教 源 流 搜 神 大 全 (1990), dated to the late sixteenth or early seventeenth century (Dudbridge 2004: 68).”
From Death and Demonization of a Bodhisattva: Guanyin's Reformulation within Chinese Religion (2016) · cites this paper as Dudbridge 2004
In the citing paper
“Dudbridge dates it to the late Ming (2004: 57 -59).”
From Death and Demonization of a Bodhisattva: Guanyin's Reformulation within Chinese Religion (2016) · cites this paper as Dudbridge 2004
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Death and Demonization of a Bodhisattva: Guanyin's Reformulation within Chinese Religion
Meulenbeld, M. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfv104 · Cited by 12
(2012) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860265.001.0001 · Cited by 10
Crosby, K. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860265.003.0004 · Cited by 7
Scarecrows,Up ā sakas, Fetuses, and Other Child Monastics in Middle-Period Indian Buddhism
Langenberg, A. P. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860265.003.0002 · Cited by 6
The Precocious Child in Chinese Buddhism
Levering, M. (2012) · Little Buddhas · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860265.003.0005 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Dudbridge, G.
- Corresponding author
- Dudbridge, Glen
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2004-02-19
- OpenAlex
- W4388434517
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- Guanyin, Chinese folk legends, religious celibacy, filial piety, women's religious vocation, epigraphic evidence, Chinese popular literature, Chinese drama, folk religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review