The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Admirable Life and the Desirable Life
Abstract
Recently virtue ethicists have given a lot of attention to the connection between two senses of a good life: the moral sense and the sense of a happy or flourishing life. Socrates insisted that a virtuous life is both necessary and sufficient for happiness, a claim that is as hard for us to accept as it was for the jury in Socrates’ trial. Still, many moral philosophers continue to exercise their ingenuity in arguing that the moral life is at least necessary for the happy life, even if not sufficient, but even this weaker claim is unconvincing to many. It seems to me that whenever someone makes a claim that stretches credibility and it continues to influence countless reflective persons for millennia, it is worth examining the motives behind it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Elsewhere, Zagzebski (2006, 60) describes the admirable exemplar as 'imitably attractive' , with a 'power to move us' .”
From Beautiful Bodhisattvas: The Aesthetics of Spiritual Exemplarity (2017) · cites this paper as Zagzebski 2006, 60
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beautiful Bodhisattvas: The Aesthetics of Spiritual Exemplarity
James Kidd, I. (2017) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2017.1386417 · Cited by 24
The situationist critique of virtue ethics
Sreenivasan, G. (2013) · The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics · doi:10.1017/cco9780511734786.014 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Zagzebski, L.
- Corresponding author
- Zagzebski, Linda
- ORCID
- Zagzebski, Linda
- Venue
- Values and Virtues
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2006-11-16
- Pages
- 53-66
- OpenAlex
- W4388389426
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
- Keywords
- good life, virtue ethics, happiness, eudaimonia, moral life, Socrates, virtue and happiness, necessary and sufficient conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review