The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Nature and the Conditions of Human Autonomy and Flourishing: Self-Determination Theory and Basic Psychological Needs
Abstract
Human beings have fundamental psychological propensities toward growth, integrity, and wellness. Yet, historically, many approaches to motivation have ignored these inner propensities, focusing instead on how external contingencies shape expectancies and behaviors. This chapter reviews recent work in self-determination theory, an organismic approach in which people’s intrinsic, growth-oriented propensities are a central focus. Self-determination theory argues that people have basic psychological needs to experience competence, autonomy, and relatedness to others. Satisfaction of these basic needs facilitates autonomous motivation and wellness, whereas the frustration of these needs contributes to ill-being and is associated with lower quality, and often highly controlled, forms of motivation. Autonomous and controlled forms of motivation differ in their antecedents, neurological underpinnings, and outcomes. Although most of the experimentation and evidence base of self-determination theory has focused on proximal relationships (e.g., families, dyads, classrooms, teams, or workgroups), recent research is extending self-determination theory to address pervasive contexts (e.g., cultural or economic systems) and how they both directly and indirectly affect need satisfaction and motivation, thereby impacting people’s development and wellness. Pervasive contexts also influence people’s aspirational horizons and the life goals they pursue, further influencing both individual and community wellness. More need-supportive contexts conduce to more authentic living and intrinsic aspirations, which in turn promote more prosocial attitudes and actions and greater personal and societal wellness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SDT assumes that humans are inherently prone toward psychological growth and integration and, thus, toward learning, mastery, and connection with others. 45”
From Fostering Motivation toward Chemistry through Augmented Reality Educational Escape Activities. A Self-Determination Theory Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“To achieve high-quality forms of motivation and engagement, three needs are seen as fundamental: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. 45”
From Fostering Motivation toward Chemistry through Augmented Reality Educational Escape Activities. A Self-Determination Theory Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elford, D., Lancaster, S. J., & Jones, G. A. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00428 · Cited by 49
Ramirez, K. B. C., Ong, A. K. S., & Tablan, J. P. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105286 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, R. M., Ryan, W. S., Di Domenico, S. I., & Deci, E. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2019-08-12
- Pages
- 88-110
- OpenAlex
- W2975389275
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- self-determination theory, basic psychological needs, autonomy, need satisfaction, competence, relatedness, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, intrinsic motivation, organismic approach, wellness, eudaimonia, life goals, prosocial behavior, authenticity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review