Cited by 92Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsHuman Behavior and MotivationPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Nature and the Conditions of Human Autonomy and Flourishing: Self-Determination Theory and Basic Psychological Needs

Ryan, Richard M., Ryan, William S., Di Domenico, Stefano I., Deci, Edward L.·2019·The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation

Abstract

Human beings have fundamental psychological propensities toward growth, integrity, and wellness. Yet, historically, many approaches to motivation have ignored these inner propensities, focusing instead on how external contingencies shape expectancies and behaviors. This chapter reviews recent work in self-determination theory, an organismic approach in which people’s intrinsic, growth-oriented propensities are a central focus. Self-determination theory argues that people have basic psychological needs to experience competence, autonomy, and relatedness to others. Satisfaction of these basic needs facilitates autonomous motivation and wellness, whereas the frustration of these needs contributes to ill-being and is associated with lower quality, and often highly controlled, forms of motivation. Autonomous and controlled forms of motivation differ in their antecedents, neurological underpinnings, and outcomes. Although most of the experimentation and evidence base of self-determination theory has focused on proximal relationships (e.g., families, dyads, classrooms, teams, or workgroups), recent research is extending self-determination theory to address pervasive contexts (e.g., cultural or economic systems) and how they both directly and indirectly affect need satisfaction and motivation, thereby impacting people’s development and wellness. Pervasive contexts also influence people’s aspirational horizons and the life goals they pursue, further influencing both individual and community wellness. More need-supportive contexts conduce to more authentic living and intrinsic aspirations, which in turn promote more prosocial attitudes and actions and greater personal and societal wellness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190666453.013.6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Ryan, R. M., Ryan, W. S., Di Domenico, S. I., & Deci, E. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation
Published
2019-08-12
Pages
88-110
OpenAlex
W2975389275
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
self-determination theory, basic psychological needs, autonomy, need satisfaction, competence, relatedness, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, intrinsic motivation, organismic approach, wellness, eudaimonia, life goals, prosocial behavior, authenticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review