Race, SIGNS, and the Body: Towards a Theory of Racial Semiotics
Abstract
This chapter considers the utility of a racial semiotics, or raciosemiotics, to further explore the ways race, language, and the body co-construct one another via multiscalar signification. It begins with a brief overview of semiotic theory, underscoring contemporary scholars’ focus on context and materiality. Drawing from Fanonian phenomenology and from ethnographic research with Black-identified young people in the United States and Liberia, the chapter discusses how antiblackness, as a transhistorical interpretive frame, compounds the semiotic weight of Black bodies and shapes how individuals in such bodies make meaning with others. Finally, by focusing on the racialized body in the construction of meaning, I suggest that attending closely to young people’s raciosemiotic labor—meaning-making about and through race—can move us closer towards developing a theory of racial semiotics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Smalls (2020) finds that her participants' positionality often occurs in response to or rejection of broader discourses such as anti-black racism, and characterises their identity work as 'constructive and theorised practice'.
“Smalls (2020) similarly finds that her participants' positionality often occurs in response to (or rejection of) broader discourses such as anti-black racism; Smalls characterises the young people's identity work as 'constructive and theorised practice' in which they claim their place in the world (2020: 254).”
From ‘You're not supposed to be gay, you're black’: Analysing race and LGBTQ+ youth identity through an intersectional lens (2025) · cites this paper as Smalls, 2020
Cites
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510 · see citing works
Wynter, S. (2003) · CR: The New Centennial Review · doi:10.1353/ncr.2004.0015 · Cited by 5,753 · see citing works
Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445605054407 · Cited by 3,797 · see citing works
Césaire, A. (2022) · Postcolonlsm · doi:10.4324/9781003101406-19 · Cited by 3,705 · see citing works
Undoing Appropriateness: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Language Diversity in Education.
Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149 · Cited by 2,829 · see citing works
The Everyday Language of White Racism
Hill, J. H. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9781444304732 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jones, L. (2025) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12676 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smalls, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smalls, Krystal A.
- ORCID
- Smalls, Krystal A.
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of Language and Race
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2020-10-08
- Pages
- 232-260
- OpenAlex
- W3092960533
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 183.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Semiotics and Representation Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil
- Keywords
- race, body, anti-Blackness, Black youth, meaning-making, semiotic theory, materiality, language and race, Black body
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review