The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Oxford Handbook of Group Counseling
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Regardless of facilitator identity, it is recommended that group leaders remain mindful of their privileged status or shared identity, consider potential biases regarding the subgroups of the LGBTQ community and take necessary steps to address any bias, and disclose their identity during initial screening interviews with potential clients/patients, which can build trust and openness [67,81].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edwards, M., Adams, E. M., Waldo, M., Hadfield, O. D., & Biegel, G. M. (2014) · The Journal for Specialists in Group Work · doi:10.1080/01933922.2014.891683 · Cited by 157
Frantell, K. A., Miles, J. R., & Ruwe, A. M. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419835923 · Cited by 75
Qualitative Research in Group Work: Status, Synergies, and Implementation
Rubel, D. J., & Okech, J. E. A. (2017) · The Journal for Specialists in Group Work · doi:10.1080/01933922.2016.1264522 · Cited by 61
Lehtinen, A., Kostiainen, E., & Näykki, P. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104299 · Cited by 61
Soboleva, I. V., & Bakhmetjev, Y. A. (2014) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-014-9268-8 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2011-08-22
- OpenAlex
- W610922302
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- group counseling, group therapy, group dynamics, group process, therapeutic groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
