The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Couples and Stress: How Demands Outside a Relationship Affect Intimacy within the Relationship
Abstract
Conventional wisdom on intimate processes within couples has tended to ignore the way those processes can be facilitated or constrained by circumstances outside the relationship. The goal of this chapter is to review developments over the last 15 years that have addressed this oversight by directly linking intimate processes within couples to the quality of their external demands and supports. Toward this end, the chapter is organized into four sections. The first section defines some of the common terms in this area of research, and describes historical and contemporary models that have guided most research on stress and relationships. The next section describes research over the past two decades that has addressed two pressing questions: (1) What are the mechanisms through which stress outside a relationship affects outcomes within it? (2) What are the characteristics and circumstances of couples that are more or less susceptible to the effects of stress? The third section offers several recommendations for the next generation of research on stress and relationships. A final conclusion offers a historical perspective, and draws out some implications of this work for government polices directed at relationships and families.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964
The Psychology of Close Relationships: Fourteen Core Principles
Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038 · Cited by 370
Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Relationships
Karney, B. R. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-051920-013658 · Cited by 234
“Contemporary versions of this perspective identify two specific routes through which challenging circumstances affect intimacy (Karney & Neff 2013, Neff & Karney 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNeff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2016) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.013 · Cited by 175
Self-citationBalzarini, R. N., Muise, A., Zoppolat, G., Bartolomeo, A. A. D., Rodrigues, D. L., Alonso-Ferres, M., Urgancı, B., Debrot, A., Pichayayothin, N. B., Dharma, C., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/e3fh4 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Karney, B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karney, Benjamin
- ORCID
- Karney, Benjamin
- Venue
- Oxford Handbooks Online
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-04-12
- OpenAlex
- W2520734355
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Keywords
- couple stress, intimacy, external demand, relationship quality, stress buffering, stress vulnerability, stress mechanisms, family policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Couples and Stress: How Demands Outside a Relationship Affect Intimacy within the Relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0030
- The paper
- Karney, B. (2013). Couples and Stress: How Demands Outside a Relationship Affect Intimacy within the Relationship. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0030