The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 40 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Nineteenth-Century Catholic Reception of Aquinas
Open accessAbstract
In the second half of the eighteenth century, under the influence of the Enlightenment, Catholic theology had increasingly turned away from its scholastic tradition. A renewal of Thomist thought started in the first decades of the nineteenth century, especially from Italy. Its original concern was to overcome the modern philosophies that were perceived as endangering faith. From the middle of the century, the movement spread to other parts of Europe, gaining support of the Church’s magisterium under Pope Pius IX. In the wake of the encyclical Aeterni Patris (1879) written by his successor Leo XIII, neo-scholasticism made its final breakthrough in Catholic academic life. Subsequently, numerous Thomist-oriented textbooks were published and Thomist academies were founded throughout Europe. The critical edition of the works of Aquinas (Editio Leonia) marked the beginning of a period of intense historical research on medieval theology and philosophy.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This chapter surveys the Catholic reception of Aquinas in the nineteenth century, tracing the shift from scattered or anti-Thomist early-century theology to an organized neo-Thomist/neo-scholastic movement, especially after Leo XIII’s *Aeterni Patris* (1879). It argues that the movement was primarily systematic and restorative, with Thomas as an authoritative reference often read through early modern scholastic norms.
Key findings
- Before c. 1850, reception was fragmented: post-Tridentine scholastic literature stagnated from about 1750; Hermes (1775–1831) and Günther (1783–1863) built systems on anti-Thomist premises, while Catholic Romanticism took up Thomist ideas “at best piecemeal.”
- From about 1850, a neo-Thomist/neo-scholastic movement consolidated, first in Italy and Germany: Sanseverino founded Italy’s first Thomist academy in 1846; Plassmann published a five-volume Thomist philosophy course in 1857–62; Kleutgen’s *Theologie der Vorzeit* began in 1853 and was complete by 1870.
- Papal and institutional promotion culminated in Leo XIII’s *Aeterni Patris* (4 August 1879), followed by the 1880 motu proprio for a new edition of Thomas, Aquinas named patron of Catholic schools in 1880, the Pontifical Academy of St Thomas Aquinas (1880), and the Angelicum (1895); the Dominicans prescribed an oath to Thomas’s “solid teaching” in 1898.
- The movement was primarily systematic rather than historical: Thomas was an authoritative reference for all neo-scholastics, but interpretation often remained bound to early modern school norms; historical-critical medieval studies at the end of the century were both a fruit of neo-scholasticism and a root of its overcoming.
Methods
- Design: historical-theological survey chapter in a handbook; no new empirical data or formal sample.
- Data/sample: published works, periodicals, institutional and papal documents from the nineteenth century, organized by period and country (Italy, Germany, other countries).
- Analysis: narrative synthesis of secondary literature, identifying figures, institutions, publications, and papal measures; no formal comparative or quantitative analysis.
Limitations
- Stated: Not stated in the paper.
- Evident: the chapter is selective; the author explicitly says that “only possible to mention a small number” of authors/works can be treated, so coverage is illustrative rather than exhaustive.
- Evident: it offers no systematic methodology or quantitative evidence; its claims rest on cited historical scholarship.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“One of them, Serafino Sordi (1793-1865), entered the Jesuit order and, together with his brother Domenico Sordi (1790-1880) and Luigi Taparelli d' Azeglio (1793-1862), who wrote works on social philosophy and the doctrine of natural law, provided the stimulus for a new Thomist tendency at the Coliegio Romano in the 1820s (Schmidinger 1988: 110-16;Peitz 2oo6d;2oo6e).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schmidinger 1988: 110-16
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Peitz 2006d
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Peitz 2006e
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“when it came to putting this into practice, its taking up of Thomist ideas was at best piecemeal.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whereas the second half of the eighteenth century still saw appreciable attempts to integrate scholastic heritage into Wolffian methodology in the teaching of philosophy and theology”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The important dogmatics handbooks by Franz Anton Staudenmaier (1800-56) and Johannes Evangelist von Kuhn (1806-87) make positive reference to scholastic authors, above all Thomas”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“in the 1870s he developed a course in philosophy written in the same spirit (Cornoldi 1872), which was translated into several languages and can be regarded as a prime example of rigid neo-Thomism in Italy.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cornoldi 1872
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
In the paper
“The actual cradle of Italian neo-Thomism is generally held to be the Coliegio Alberoni of the Lazarists in Piacenza, which had had Thomist-orientated teachers since its foun dation in 1751 (Rossi 1988).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rossi 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
In the paper
“In the Tübingen School, sharp and methodologically sound criticism of scholasticism is to be found in Johann Baptist von Hirscher (1788-1865) (Hirscher 1823)”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hirscher 1823
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
In the paper
“The actual cradle of Italian neo-Thomism is generally held to be the Coliegio Alberoni of the Lazarists in Piacenza, which had had Thomist-orientated teachers since its foun dation in 1751 (Rossi 1988).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rossi 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
In the paper
“a paradigm shift finally came about at the beginning of the nineteenth century (Leinsle 2010:354-5).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Leinsle 2010:354-5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“even though, often under the influence of the state authorities, modern trends had also been established in the teaching at ecclesias tical seminaries.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 42
- It may state two separate claims as one. 28
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though, with its striving to bring about a new synthesis between reason and faith, Catholic Romanticism had rediscovered one of thirteenth-century scholasticism's fun damental concerns”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Students took up his ideas and subsequently spread them beyond Piacenza.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“whereas Johann Adam Möhler (1796-1838) repeatedly cited evidence from Thomas in his Symbolik.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Jesuit Giovanni Maria Cornoldi (1822-92) had studied both in Piacenza and subsequently in Rome (Malusa 1986-9).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Malusa 1986-9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“This is particularly evident in the five-volume dogmatics by the Mainz dogmatist Bruno F. L. Liebermann (1759-1844), which was regarded by some of his contemporaries as still belonging to the bld school' of methodology (Peitz 2006a: 32)”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Peitz 2006a: 32
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“he aimed to give a contemporary shape to Thomist thought, which he himself employed in his teaching without ever putting it in published form.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Piacenza-born secular priest Vincenzo Buzzetti (1777-1824) taught there from 1806, first of all philosophy, then from 1808 until his death in 1824 dogmatics (Peitz 2006b).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Peitz 2006b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“even though it no longer displays any discernible interest in a speculative deepening of the traditional contents (Walter 2018).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Walter 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The unmistakable inspiration of Franz von Baader (1765-1841) by Thomas Aquinas has not yet been fully investigated.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which were often still written in Latin, and they con tinued to contain many of the structural principles, concepts and theses of scholasti cism, though focusing on 'positive' theology.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“he aimed to give a contemporary shape to Thomist thought, which he himself employed in his teaching without ever putting it in published form.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“As a representative o f strict Thom ism in Belgium at the tim e o f Leo XIII, one can cite the D om inican A ntoninus M. D u m m erm u th , who m ade a nam e for him self w ith a bulky w ork on the praemotio physica (D um m erm uth 1886), directed against the M olinist exposition given by the G erm an Jesuit G erhard Schneem ann (1829-85), w ho was living in Leuven at the tim e (Schneem ann 1879;”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Dummermuth 1886
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Schneemann 1879; 1880
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“emphasizes that this does not imply a rejec tion of modern scientific progress.He leaves scope for departures from scholastic think ing where the latter proves no longer to be tenable, and calls especially for the study of the original sources.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mercier, w ho founded the Révue néo-scholastique as the insti tute's publication organ in 1894, advocated an open form o f A ristotelianism understood from the perspective o f scholasticism and open to m o d ern insights, w hich included dia logue w ith the natural sciences, and spoke out against a philosophy th at was too strongly constrained by theological guidelines.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Almost all Catholic textbooks of philosophy and systematic theology in the last third of the nineteenth century are shaped by neo-scholasticism and endeavour to connect to Aquinas' thinking.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of historical works dedicated to him also greatly increased.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At their general chapters in the 1890s, the Dominicans formally adopted the resolution that they would orient themselves to their order's saint, and in 1898 prescribed a special oath of loyalty to the 'solid teaching of St Thomas' for their members.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1889 the D om inicans had taken over the teaching at the newly founded University o f Fribourg in Switzerland.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“in 1876 the future cardinal firstpublished his Summaphilosophica, which was reprinted countless times and remained one of the most important manuals until after the First World War (Giammarino 1975).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Giammarino 1975
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The perhaps most independent theologian within German neo-scholasticism was the Cologne seminary professor Matthias Joseph Scheeben (1835-88).”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Oratorian Alphonse Gratry (1805-72) had 'through his enthusiastic reference to Thomas Aquinas prepared the way for neo-Thomism' (Grabmann 1933: 264) without its being possible to associate him properly speaking with this school of thought.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Grabmann 1933: 264
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“His principal work is a seven-volume, partly posthumously published course on philosophy (Sanseverino 1862-8).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sanseverino 1862-8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Further important measures taken by Leo XIII to implement the concerns of Aeterni Patris were the elevation of Aquinas as the patron of Catholic schools in 1880 (Breve Cum hoc sit), the founding of the Pontifical Academy of St Thomas Aquinas in Rome in the same year, and of the Roman Dominican university, the Angelicum, in 1895 (Berger 2005:121-81).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Berger 2005:121-81
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The new tu rn to Thom as A quinas from about 1850 onw ards spread, in the form o f 'neo-Thom ism ' or rather 'neo-scholasticism ' , from Italy and G erm any and, being increasingly prom oted by the Church, shaped Catholic philosophy and theology for a century.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A prominent figure in Spanish neo-Thomism was the Dominican Zeferino González (1831-94).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vernacular excerpt from the Summa by Frédéric Lebrethon (1812-79) was even honoured in its second edition (Lebrethon 1866-7), with a foreword by Pope Pius IX in which the neo-scholastic programme is con firmed.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The rapidly produced first volumes of the Editio Leonina (i882ff) failed to satisfy even their contemporaries with respect to textual criti cism.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He ensured its financing and entrusted the task to Cardinals de Luca, Simeoni, and Zigliara.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From 1880, the world's first explicitly Thomist periodical, Divus Thomas, appeared in Piacenza under the aegis of Alberto Barberis (1847-96).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Roman college, however, proved itself pretty much incapable of producing any noteworthy academic personalities after Roselli, who had spent the last phase of his teaching career there.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Kleutgen comprehensively extended the program m e o f philosophy and fundam ental theology to all areas o f dog matics, and presented the 'Theology o f the Past' (understood as tim e-transcending the ology) as also being a basis for overcom ing inner-theological rationalism .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Its prim ary interest was systematic, not historical.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fruit of his reading of Thomas was a work on Aquinas' philosophy (Gonzalez 1864), which is accounted foundational for Spanish neo-scholasticism.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Glossner's main work is his two-volume Lehrbuch der katholischen Dogmatik, published in 1874, in which he builds on the lecture manuscripts of his Eichstatt teacher Joseph Ernst but also endeavours to provide a more strictly Thomist presentation of the treatises and, above all in ecclesiology, places novel emphases.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“in 1876 the future cardinal firstpublished his Summaphilosophica, which was reprinted countless times and remained one of the most important manuals until after the First World War (Giammarino 1975).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Giammarino 1975
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the two main theological works, the Summa theologiae and the Summa contra gentiles, he ordered the commentaries by Cajetan and Sylvester of Ferrara to be reprinted with them, thus supporting the interpretive tradition of the Dominican school.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The renewal of Thomism in Belgium is inextricably linked to the nam e o f Désiré-Joseph M ercier (1851-1926) (Van R iet 1988), w ho w as a p p o in te d in 1882 to a c h air for Thom ist philosophy in Leuven, w hich had been established in the wake o f Aeterni Patris, and in 1889 becam e the first president o f the likewise newly established Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Van Riet 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“All the same, there were as many as three French translations of the Summa theologiae published between 1850 and 1870 (C.J. Drioux, J. Carmagnolle, F. Lachat).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His most important works on dogmatics, Die Mysterien des Christentums (1865) and the uncompleted Handbuch der katholischen Dogmatik (1873-1887), prove that although he was in every respect inspired by Thomas, he cannot be classed as a strict Thomist.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This changed from the early 1850s, when he began to work on the edi torial staff of the periodical Civiltil cattolica, which at that time adopted an explicitly Thomist orientation.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1840 Sanseverino founded the periodical La scienza e la fede in Naples, the purpose of which was to tackle various areas of intellectual life with the aim of defending the Catholic faith.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Lucerne, a Thomas Academ y was founded by C anon A nton P ortm ann .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1846, again in his home town, Sanseverino in 1846 inaugurated Italy's first Thomist academy (Accademia di Filosofia tomista).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1840 Sanseverino founded the periodical La scienza e la fede in Naples, the purpose of which was to tackle various areas of intellectual life with the aim of defending the Catholic faith.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Sanseverino's friend Nunzio Signoriello (1820-89) became known above all as the author of a lexicon of scholastic terms (Signoriello 1864).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Signoriello 1864
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1884, Maurice d'Hulst (1841-96), as the first rector of the Institut Catholique in Paris, founded a Société de Saint Thomas d' Aquin.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Revue thomiste, the strictly T hom ist character o f w hich becam e progres sively apparent, was launched as the faculty's jo u rn al in 1893.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It was only w ith the beginning o f an historical-critical approach to m edieval studies at the end o f the nineteenth century that people learnt to understand Thom as once again in the context o f his own age, and also to take in account insights as to the way his works cam e into being.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The repristination o f the post-T ridentine school debates (such as the dispute over grace) only rarely achieved th e ir form er com plexity and originality of reflection.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alongside providing this stim ulus, the neo-T hom ism that began in the nineteenth century had fu rth er m erits which, for all the justified criticism o f its unhistorical and restorative nature, should not be overlooked.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“in the 1870s he developed a course in philosophy written in the same spirit (Cornoldi 1872), which was translated into several languages and can be regarded as a prime example of rigid neo-Thomism in Italy.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cornoldi 1872
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is a presentation distinguished by its clarity and succinctness, albeit one in which-as so often in neo-Thomism-the controversies with modern philosophy confine themselves to rejecting summary theses.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It was not until the mid-nineteenth century that this changed again, with Tommaso Maria Zigliara (1833-93), a young Dominican embarked on his studies in Rome who was to become one of the most famous neo-Thomist philosophers of his age.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thomas A quinas was an authoritative point o f reference for all neo-scholastics; however, the way in w hich he was interpreted often rem ained com m itted to the norm s laid dow n by the early m odern school tradition, being fu rth er constricted by concentrating on strict Thom ism on the one hand and selected authors o f the Jesuit school on the other.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Its original concern was to construct an A r is to telian-scholastic p/ii/osopfow perennis in order to overcom e the m o d ern philoso phies that were perceived as endangering faith, and to restore the C hurch's authority against the claims to autonom y m ade by m o d ern reason.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reason for Liberatore's intellectual turnabout apparently lay in his studies of the history of philosophy as well as in his reception of the writings of Sanseverino and Clemens.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It was a fruit o f neo-scholasticism , but at the sam e tim e one o f the roots o f its being overcome, bringing out as it did the historical contingency o f A quinas' th inking an d increasing awareness o f the variety o f scholastic tho u g h t that existed before and after Aquinas.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The attem pts to present the Thom ist 'system' em ploying the m o d ern m ethodological ideal o f basing this on just a few underlying principles did serve to systematically penetrate the enor m ous volum e o f m aterial an d they also pursued didactic interests, b u t they often obscured the elem ents that did n ot com e from A quinas himself, and prevented the necessary differentiations th at w”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the tw entieth century the innovative potential o f these factors gradually came m ore and m ore to fruition.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Liberatore's philosophy course has conflicting volume counts
MinorThe text calls the cited Latin philosophy course three-volume, while its bibliography entry lists two volumes.
“a three-volume philosophy course in Latin (Liberatore 1860-61)”
“Liberatore, M. (1860-61), Institutionesphilosophicae, 2 vols”
Sanseverino's course has conflicting publication end dates
MinorThe text dates the cited course to 1862-8, but the bibliography dates it to 1862-78.
“His principal work is a seven-volume, partly posthumously published course on philosophy (Sanseverino 1862-8).”
“Sanseverino, G. (1862-78), Philosophia Christiana cum antiqua et nova comparata”
Kleutgen's first edition is said to be incomplete until 1870 despite an 1860 final volume
MinorThe text says the complete first edition was unavailable until 1870, whereas the bibliography dates its "Letzter Band" (final volume) to 1860.
“the complete first edition was not available until 1870.”
“Kleutgen, J. (1860), Die Theologie der Vorzeit vertheidigt. Letzter Band”
Citations
Cites
C., J. E., & Wundt, W. M. (1898) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2175556 · Cited by 87
Introduction to Scholastic Theology
Leinsle, U. G. (2012) · Catholic University of America Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt3fgqcd · Cited by 67
Christliche Philosophie Im Katholischen Denken des 19. Und 20. Jahrhunderts
Coreth, E., Neidl, W. M., & Pfligersdorffer, G. (1987) · Cited by 43
The Thomistic Revival and the Relationship between the Jesuits and the Papacy, 1878–1914
Rafferty, O. P. (2014) · Theological Studies · doi:10.1177/0040563914548652 · Cited by 7
Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters
Stöckl, A. (2009) · Cited by 6
Werner, K. F. H. (1889) · Cited by 5
Die neuscholastische Philosophie im deutschsprachigen Raum
Walter, P. (1988) · FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) · Cited by 2
»Den Weltkreis täglich von Verderben bringenden Irrtümern befreien« (Leo XIII.)
Walter, P. (2013) · Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Europäische Geschichte Mainz. Beiheft · doi:10.13109/9783666101304.319 · Cited by 2
Johann Baptist Heinrich als dogmatischer Theologe
Walter, P. (2003) · FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) · Cited by 1
(1975) · OPUS (Augsburg University) · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- Bataillon, L. J. (1981), ‘L’édition Léonine des œuvres de saint Thomas et les études médiévales’, in A. Piolanti (ed.), Atti dell’VIII Congresso tomistico internazionale. ‘L’édition Léonine Patris nell’arco di un secolo (Città del Vaticano: Libreria Ed. Vaticana), 452–64.
- 2005, In der Schule des hl. Thomas von Aquin. Studien zur Geschichte des Thomismus
- 1892, De verbo incarnato. Commentarius in tertiam partem S. Thomae
- 1893, De Deo Uno et Trino. Commentarius in primam partem S. Thomae
- 1856, De scholasticorum sententia philosophiam esse theologiae ancillam commentatio
- 1872, Lezioni di filosofia ordinate allo studio delle altre scienze
- 2010, Matteo Liberatore, un cattolico intransigente, Gregorianum
- 1991, Enchiridion symbolorum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum/Kompendium der Glaubensbekenntnisse und kirchlichen Lehrentscheidungen
- 1978, Gaetano Sanseverino filosofo. Tentativo di riconstruzione, Doctor communis
- 1886, S. Thomas et doctrina praemotionis physicae, seu responsio ad R. P. Schneemann, S.J., aliosque doctrinae scholae thomisticae impugnatores
- 1962, La rinascita del tomismo a Perugia. Appunti per una storia del neotomismo, Aquinas
- 2019, Leo XIII. Papst und Staatsmann
- 1889, Die Lehre des hl. Thomas über den Einfluss Gottes auf die Handlungen der vernünftigen Geschöpfe
- 1890, Die Lehre des heil. Thomas von Aquin über die Willensfreiheit der vernünftigen Wesen
- 1889, Die Philosophie des Thomas von Aquino kritisch gewürdigt
- 1975, Alle origini del neo-tomismo. Il Cardinal Tommaso Zigliara (1833–1893) nelle sue opere filosofiche e nell’epistolario, Memorie domenicane
- 1864, Estudios sobre la filosofía de Santo Tomás
- 1933, Die Geschichte der katholischen Theologie seit dem Ausgang der Väterzeit
- 1999, Herman Schell (1850–1906). Ein Theologenschicksal im Bannkreis der Modernismuskontroverse
- 1823, Ueber das Verhältniß des Evangeliums zu der theologischen Scholastik der neuesten Zeit im katholischen Deutschland. Zugleich als Beitrag zur Katechetik
- 1974, Deux promoteurs inattendus de la philosophie de Saint Thomas d’Aquin, Divinitas
- 1860, Die Theologie der Vorzeit vertheidigt. Letzter Band
- 1881, Institutiones theologicae in usum scholarium
- 1866, Petite somme théologique de saint Thomas d’Aquin à l’usage des ecclésiastiques et des gens du monde
- 1857, Della conoscenza intellettuale
- 1860, Institutiones philosophicae
- 1986, Neotomismo e intransigentismo cattolico
- 1852, Scholastik
- 373Mattes, W. (1853), ‘Thomas von Aquin’, in H. J. Wetzer and B. Welte (eds), Kirchen-Lexikon, vol. 10 (Freiburg: Herder), 911–31.
- 1996, Nineteenth-Century Scholasticism: The Search for a Unitary Method
- 1878, Die Mariologie des heiligen Thomas von Aquin
- 2002, Die Gegenwart Gottes in der Gnade. Universalität und Relation der Gnade nach Eichstätter Theologen im 19. Jahrhundert
- 2005, Philosophie und kirchliche Autorität. Der Fall Jakob Frohschammer vor der römischen Indexkongregation (1855–1864)
- Paul, E. (1975), ‘Matthias Joseph Scheeben’, in H. Fries and G. Schwaiger (eds), Katholische Theologen Deutschlands im 19. Jahrhundert, vol. 2 (Munich: Kösel), 386–408.
- 2006, Die Anfänge der Neuscholastik in Deutschland und Italien (1818–1870)
- 1965, Gaetano Sanseverino nel primo centenario della morte
- 1981, Atti dell’ VIII Congresso tomistico internazionale. L’enciclica Aeterni Patris nell’arco di un secolo
- 1986, La filosofia cristiana in Mons. Salvatore Talamo ispiratore della ‘Aeterni Patris
- 1885, Das System der theologischen Summe des hl. Thomas von Aquin
- 1968, Mensch als Mitte. Leben und Werk Carl Werners
- Rossi, G. F. (1988), ‘Die Bedeutung des Collegio Alberoni in Piacenza für die Entstehung des Neuthomismus’, in E. Coreth, W. M. Neidl, and G. Pfligersdorffer (eds), Christliche Philosophie im katholischen Denken des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, vol. 2: Rückgriff auf scholastisches Erbe (Graz: Styria), 83–108.
- 1862, Philosophia Christiana cum antiqua et nova comparata
- 1862, Wissenschaftliche Richtungen auf dem Gebiete des Katholicismus in neuester und in gegenwärtiger Zeit
- Schmidinger, H. M. (1988), ‘Thomistische Zentren in Rom, Neapel, Perugia usw. S. Sordi, D. Sordi, L. Taparelli d’Azeglio, M. Liberatore, C. M. Curci, G. M. Cornoldi u. a.’, in E. Coreth, W. M. Neidl, and G. Pfligersdorffer (eds), Christliche Philosophie im katholischen Denken des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, vol. 2: Rückgriff auf scholastisches Erbe (Graz: Styria), 109–30.
- 1879, Die Entstehung der thomistisch-molinistischen Kontroverse. Dogmengeschichtliche Studie
- 1880, Weitere Entwicklung der thomistisch-molinistischen Controverse. Dogmengeschichtliche Studie
- 1873, Die scholastische Lehre von Materie und Form und ihre Harmonie mit den Thatsachen der Naturwissenschaft
- 1886, Die katholische Wahrheit oder die theologische Summa des heiligen Thomas von Aquin deutsch wiedergegeben
- 1881, Thomas-Lexikon
- 1864, Lexicon peripateticum philosophico-theologicum
- Van Riet, G. (1988), ‘Kardinal Désiré Mercier (1851–1926) und das philosophische Institut in Löwen’, in E. Coreth, W. M. Neidl, and G. Pfligersdorffer (eds), Christliche Philosophie im katholischen Denken des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, vol. 2: Rückgriff auf scholastisches Erbe (Graz: Styria), 206–40.
- 1860, Die Lehre von der Wirksamkeit der Sakramente ex opere operato in ihrer Entwicklung innerhalb der Scholastik und ihrer Bedeutung für die christliche Heilslehre dargestellt
- 1865, Natur und Uebernatur. Das Dogma von der Gnade und die theol. Frage der Gegenwart
- 1867, Neue Untersuchungen über das Dogma von der Gnade und das Wesen des christlichen Glaubens
- 1867, Zur Orientirung über Wesen und Aufgabe der christlichen Philosophie in der Gegenwart
- 2013, Die Nonnen von Sant’Ambrogio. Eine wahre Geschichte
Metadata
- Authors
- Marschler, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Augsburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Marschler, Thomas
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of the Reception of Aquinas
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2021-01-13
- Pages
- 359-374
- OpenAlex
- W3157657942
- Semantic Scholar
- 7645c88f0f90acaad7b7130ed356f4e867e0f06c
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Catholicism and Religious Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Legal Thought
- Keywords
- Thomas Aquinas, Thomism, neo-scholasticism, scholastic tradition, Pope Pius IX, Pope Leo XIII, Aeterni Patris, medieval theology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-19, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-19 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review