Cited by 0Medieval Philosophy and TheologyCatholicism and Religious StudiesHistorical Economic and Legal Thought

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 40 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Nineteenth-Century Catholic Reception of Aquinas

Open access
Marschler, Thomas·2021·The Oxford Handbook of the Reception of Aquinas

Abstract

In the second half of the eighteenth century, under the influence of the Enlightenment, Catholic theology had increasingly turned away from its scholastic tradition. A renewal of Thomist thought started in the first decades of the nineteenth century, especially from Italy. Its original concern was to overcome the modern philosophies that were perceived as endangering faith. From the middle of the century, the movement spread to other parts of Europe, gaining support of the Church’s magisterium under Pope Pius IX. In the wake of the encyclical Aeterni Patris (1879) written by his successor Leo XIII, neo-scholasticism made its final breakthrough in Catholic academic life. Subsequently, numerous Thomist-oriented textbooks were published and Thomist academies were founded throughout Europe. The critical edition of the works of Aquinas (Editio Leonia) marked the beginning of a period of intense historical research on medieval theology and philosophy.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This chapter surveys the Catholic reception of Aquinas in the nineteenth century, tracing the shift from scattered or anti-Thomist early-century theology to an organized neo-Thomist/neo-scholastic movement, especially after Leo XIII’s *Aeterni Patris* (1879). It argues that the movement was primarily systematic and restorative, with Thomas as an authoritative reference often read through early modern scholastic norms.

Key findings

  • Before c. 1850, reception was fragmented: post-Tridentine scholastic literature stagnated from about 1750; Hermes (1775–1831) and Günther (1783–1863) built systems on anti-Thomist premises, while Catholic Romanticism took up Thomist ideas “at best piecemeal.”
  • From about 1850, a neo-Thomist/neo-scholastic movement consolidated, first in Italy and Germany: Sanseverino founded Italy’s first Thomist academy in 1846; Plassmann published a five-volume Thomist philosophy course in 1857–62; Kleutgen’s *Theologie der Vorzeit* began in 1853 and was complete by 1870.
  • Papal and institutional promotion culminated in Leo XIII’s *Aeterni Patris* (4 August 1879), followed by the 1880 motu proprio for a new edition of Thomas, Aquinas named patron of Catholic schools in 1880, the Pontifical Academy of St Thomas Aquinas (1880), and the Angelicum (1895); the Dominicans prescribed an oath to Thomas’s “solid teaching” in 1898.
  • The movement was primarily systematic rather than historical: Thomas was an authoritative reference for all neo-scholastics, but interpretation often remained bound to early modern school norms; historical-critical medieval studies at the end of the century were both a fruit of neo-scholasticism and a root of its overcoming.

Methods

  • Design: historical-theological survey chapter in a handbook; no new empirical data or formal sample.
  • Data/sample: published works, periodicals, institutional and papal documents from the nineteenth century, organized by period and country (Italy, Germany, other countries).
  • Analysis: narrative synthesis of secondary literature, identifying figures, institutions, publications, and papal measures; no formal comparative or quantitative analysis.

Limitations

  • Stated: Not stated in the paper.
  • Evident: the chapter is selective; the author explicitly says that “only possible to mention a small number” of authors/works can be treated, so coverage is illustrative rather than exhaustive.
  • Evident: it offers no systematic methodology or quantitative evidence; its claims rest on cited historical scholarship.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198798026.013.21

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 30 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 42
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 28
59 of 59

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Liberatore's philosophy course has conflicting volume counts

    Minor

    The text calls the cited Latin philosophy course three-volume, while its bibliography entry lists two volumes.

  • Sanseverino's course has conflicting publication end dates

    Minor

    The text dates the cited course to 1862-8, but the bibliography dates it to 1862-78.

  • Kleutgen's first edition is said to be incomplete until 1870 despite an 1860 final volume

    Minor

    The text says the complete first edition was unavailable until 1870, whereas the bibliography dates its "Letzter Band" (final volume) to 1860.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Bataillon, L. J. (1981), ‘L’édition Léonine des œuvres de saint Thomas et les études médiévales’, in A. Piolanti (ed.), Atti dell’VIII Congresso tomistico internazionale. ‘L’édition Léonine Patris nell’arco di un secolo (Città del Vaticano: Libreria Ed. Vaticana), 452–64.
  2. 2005, In der Schule des hl. Thomas von Aquin. Studien zur Geschichte des Thomismus
  3. 1892, De verbo incarnato. Commentarius in tertiam partem S. Thomae
  4. 1893, De Deo Uno et Trino. Commentarius in primam partem S. Thomae
  5. 1856, De scholasticorum sententia philosophiam esse theologiae ancillam commentatio
  6. 1872, Lezioni di filosofia ordinate allo studio delle altre scienze
  7. 2010, Matteo Liberatore, un cattolico intransigente, Gregorianum
  8. 1991, Enchiridion symbolorum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum/Kompendium der Glaubensbekenntnisse und kirchlichen Lehrentscheidungen
  9. 1978, Gaetano Sanseverino filosofo. Tentativo di riconstruzione, Doctor communis
  10. 1886, S. Thomas et doctrina praemotionis physicae, seu responsio ad R. P. Schneemann, S.J., aliosque doctrinae scholae thomisticae impugnatores
  11. 1962, La rinascita del tomismo a Perugia. Appunti per una storia del neotomismo, Aquinas
  12. 2019, Leo XIII. Papst und Staatsmann
  13. 1889, Die Lehre des hl. Thomas über den Einfluss Gottes auf die Handlungen der vernünftigen Geschöpfe
  14. 1890, Die Lehre des heil. Thomas von Aquin über die Willensfreiheit der vernünftigen Wesen
  15. 1889, Die Philosophie des Thomas von Aquino kritisch gewürdigt
  16. 1975, Alle origini del neo-tomismo. Il Cardinal Tommaso Zigliara (1833–1893) nelle sue opere filosofiche e nell’epistolario, Memorie domenicane
  17. 1864, Estudios sobre la filosofía de Santo Tomás
  18. 1933, Die Geschichte der katholischen Theologie seit dem Ausgang der Väterzeit
  19. 1999, Herman Schell (1850–1906). Ein Theologenschicksal im Bannkreis der Modernismuskontroverse
  20. 1823, Ueber das Verhältniß des Evangeliums zu der theologischen Scholastik der neuesten Zeit im katholischen Deutschland. Zugleich als Beitrag zur Katechetik
  21. 1974, Deux promoteurs inattendus de la philosophie de Saint Thomas d’Aquin, Divinitas
  22. 1860, Die Theologie der Vorzeit vertheidigt. Letzter Band
  23. 1881, Institutiones theologicae in usum scholarium
  24. 1866, Petite somme théologique de saint Thomas d’Aquin à l’usage des ecclésiastiques et des gens du monde
  25. 1857, Della conoscenza intellettuale
  26. 1860, Institutiones philosophicae
  27. 1986, Neotomismo e intransigentismo cattolico
  28. 1852, Scholastik
  29. 373Mattes, W. (1853), ‘Thomas von Aquin’, in H. J. Wetzer and B. Welte (eds), Kirchen-Lexikon, vol. 10 (Freiburg: Herder), 911–31.
  30. 1996, Nineteenth-Century Scholasticism: The Search for a Unitary Method
  31. 1878, Die Mariologie des heiligen Thomas von Aquin
  32. 2002, Die Gegenwart Gottes in der Gnade. Universalität und Relation der Gnade nach Eichstätter Theologen im 19. Jahrhundert
  33. 2005, Philosophie und kirchliche Autorität. Der Fall Jakob Frohschammer vor der römischen Indexkongregation (1855–1864)
  34. Paul, E. (1975), ‘Matthias Joseph Scheeben’, in H. Fries and G. Schwaiger (eds), Katholische Theologen Deutschlands im 19. Jahrhundert, vol. 2 (Munich: Kösel), 386–408.
  35. 2006, Die Anfänge der Neuscholastik in Deutschland und Italien (1818–1870)
  36. 1965, Gaetano Sanseverino nel primo centenario della morte
  37. 1981, Atti dell’ VIII Congresso tomistico internazionale. L’enciclica Aeterni Patris nell’arco di un secolo
  38. 1986, La filosofia cristiana in Mons. Salvatore Talamo ispiratore della ‘Aeterni Patris
  39. 1885, Das System der theologischen Summe des hl. Thomas von Aquin
  40. 1968, Mensch als Mitte. Leben und Werk Carl Werners
  41. Rossi, G. F. (1988), ‘Die Bedeutung des Collegio Alberoni in Piacenza für die Entstehung des Neuthomismus’, in E. Coreth, W. M. Neidl, and G. Pfligersdorffer (eds), Christliche Philosophie im katholischen Denken des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, vol. 2: Rückgriff auf scholastisches Erbe (Graz: Styria), 83–108.
  42. 1862, Philosophia Christiana cum antiqua et nova comparata
  43. 1862, Wissenschaftliche Richtungen auf dem Gebiete des Katholicismus in neuester und in gegenwärtiger Zeit
  44. Schmidinger, H. M. (1988), ‘Thomistische Zentren in Rom, Neapel, Perugia usw. S. Sordi, D. Sordi, L. Taparelli d’Azeglio, M. Liberatore, C. M. Curci, G. M. Cornoldi u. a.’, in E. Coreth, W. M. Neidl, and G. Pfligersdorffer (eds), Christliche Philosophie im katholischen Denken des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, vol. 2: Rückgriff auf scholastisches Erbe (Graz: Styria), 109–30.
  45. 1879, Die Entstehung der thomistisch-molinistischen Kontroverse. Dogmengeschichtliche Studie
  46. 1880, Weitere Entwicklung der thomistisch-molinistischen Controverse. Dogmengeschichtliche Studie
  47. 1873, Die scholastische Lehre von Materie und Form und ihre Harmonie mit den Thatsachen der Naturwissenschaft
  48. 1886, Die katholische Wahrheit oder die theologische Summa des heiligen Thomas von Aquin deutsch wiedergegeben
  49. 1881, Thomas-Lexikon
  50. 1864, Lexicon peripateticum philosophico-theologicum
  51. Van Riet, G. (1988), ‘Kardinal Désiré Mercier (1851–1926) und das philosophische Institut in Löwen’, in E. Coreth, W. M. Neidl, and G. Pfligersdorffer (eds), Christliche Philosophie im katholischen Denken des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, vol. 2: Rückgriff auf scholastisches Erbe (Graz: Styria), 206–40.
  52. 1860, Die Lehre von der Wirksamkeit der Sakramente ex opere operato in ihrer Entwicklung innerhalb der Scholastik und ihrer Bedeutung für die christliche Heilslehre dargestellt
  53. 1865, Natur und Uebernatur. Das Dogma von der Gnade und die theol. Frage der Gegenwart
  54. 1867, Neue Untersuchungen über das Dogma von der Gnade und das Wesen des christlichen Glaubens
  55. 1867, Zur Orientirung über Wesen und Aufgabe der christlichen Philosophie in der Gegenwart
  56. 2013, Die Nonnen von Sant’Ambrogio. Eine wahre Geschichte

Metadata

Authors
Marschler, T.
Affiliations
University of Augsburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Marschler, Thomas
Venue
The Oxford Handbook of the Reception of Aquinas
Published
2021-01-13
Pages
359-374
OpenAlex
W3157657942
Cited by
0
References
10
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Legal Thought
Keywords
Thomas Aquinas, Thomism, neo-scholasticism, scholastic tradition, Pope Pius IX, Pope Leo XIII, Aeterni Patris, medieval theology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-19, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-19 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review