The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Local Integration
Abstract
In official policy terms, local integration—one of the three ‘durable solutions’ along with repatriation and resettlement—is a means to ending exile by allowing refugees to become full members of their host community in their first country of asylum. It is often the most viable of the three solutions, yet suffers from official neglect. This chapter examines the importance of refugees’ autonomy and of centring solutions around belonging—both at a local level and through citizenship—and argues that local integration is not so much the ‘forgotten’ solution but the official ‘forbidden’ solution. It compares two recognized categories of local integration, namely de facto and de jure local integration, and considers refugee situations in Africa. It also places local integration in a historical context and discusses obstacles to local integration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ideally, integration should extend beyond legal citizenship rights but also encompass being able to live free of discrimination by the host community or government (Crisp, 2004;Hovil, 2014).”
From Sexual and gender-based violence against South Sudanese refugees in Uganda: a mixed-methods study (2025) · cites this paper as Hovil, 2014
In the citing paper
“It is a process encompassing legal, economic, and socio-cultural dimensions (Androff, 2022;Ferris, 2019;Hovil, 2014).”
From Sexual and gender-based violence against South Sudanese refugees in Uganda: a mixed-methods study (2025) · cites this paper as Hovil, 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 1986, The Origins of Totalitarianism
- 2004, An Investigation of the Perceived Needs and Priorities Held by African Refugees in an Urban Setting in a First Country of Asylum, Journal of Refugee Studies
- 2012, Twenty-Five Years of Forced Migration, Forced Migration Review
- 2007, Self-Settled Refugees in Uganda: An Alternative Approach to Displacement?, Journal of Refugee Studies
- Jacobsen, K., and Landau, L. B. (2003) ‘The Dual Imperative in Refugee Research: Some Methodological and Ethical Considerations in Social Science Research on Forced Migration’. New Issues in Refugee Research. UNHCR Working Paper No. 19. · DOI
- Kibreab, G. (2012) ‘Invisible Integration in the Greater Horn Region of Africa’. Pp. 69–110 in K. Mengisteab and R. Bereketeab (eds.), Regional Integration in the Greater Horn Region. Oxford: James Currey Publishers. · DOI
- 2002, Refugees, Rebels and the Quest for Justice
- 2001, Young, Male and Pentecostal: Urban Refugees in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Journal of Refugee Studies
- 2001, Evaluation of UNHCR’s Policy on Refugees in Urban Areas: A Case Study Review of Cairo
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sexual and gender-based violence against South Sudanese refugees in Uganda: a mixed-methods study
Michaelsen, S. (2025) · Université de Montréal · doi:10.71781/1596
Metadata
- Authors
- Hovil, L.
- Affiliations
- International Refugee Rights Intiative
- Corresponding author
- Hovil, Lucy
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-08-04
- Pages
- 488-498
- OpenAlex
- W4242033274
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Keywords
- local integration, refugees, durable solutions, sense of belonging, citizenship, refugee policy, Africa, exile, host communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
