The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Law and Economics of Insurance
Abstract
This chapter broadly defines the law and economics of insurance. An overview of both economically oriented legal scholarship and traditional economics scholarship is provided. This vantage point reveals the centrality of certain core economic concepts to insurance law and regulation. Moreover, it suggests ways to improve the law by embracing sophisticated understandings of the economics of information asymmetries. For instance, insurance law and regulation assume that adverse selection and moral hazard are important problems in all insurance markets; however, the phenomena come in varying degrees. Thus, their magnitude is an empirical question. An equally significant lacuna in much insurance law is the absence of an equilibrium approach that anticipates insurance market reactions to legal interventions. Similarly, the specific insights of behavioral economics to understand anomalies in insurance demand and how the law might respond are emerging. The law and economics of insurance is still ripe for development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast, as emphasized by Schwarcz and Siegelman (2017), much of insurance law is designed to protect policyholders because of information asymmetries that favor insurers over policyholders.”
From The Discriminating (Pricing) Actuary (2023) · cites this paper as Schwarcz and Siegelman (2017)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Discriminating (Pricing) Actuary
Frees, E. W. (., & Huang, F. (2023) · North American Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1080/10920277.2021.1951296 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwarcz, D., & Siegelman, P.
- Venue
- The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2017-04-13
- Pages
- 480-508
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Law and Economics of Insurance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199684205.013.030
- The paper
- Schwarcz, D., & Siegelman, P. (2017). Law and Economics of Insurance. The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199684205.013.030