The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The IRT Tradition and its Applications
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, it has been accentuated that these benefits are particularly important with regard to the transferability and reuse of assessment instruments, and they render the possibility to design instruments with specific characteristics (de Ayala, 2013).”
From Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy (2016) · cites this paper as de Ayala, 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- de Ayala, R. J.
- Venue
- Oxford Handbooks Online
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-03-21
- OpenAlex
- W2643354725
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.21
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- item response theory, psychometrics, test theory, latent trait models, item response models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
