The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Expectancies and Beliefs
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our positive PE condition is comparable to a placebo manipulation (expect low pain) and our negative PE condition is comparable to a nocebo manipulation (expect high pain)31.”
From Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perception (2019) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perception
Hird, E. J., Charalambous, C., El-Deredy, W., Jones, A. K. P., & Talmi, D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45811-x · Cited by 68
Relaxing and stimulating effects of odors on time perception and their modulation by expectancy
Baccarani, A., Grondin, S., Laflamme, V., & Brochard, R. (2020) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02182-0 · Cited by 21
Harnessing the placebo effect to enhance emotion regulation effectiveness and choice
Shafir, R., Israel, M., & Colloca, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29045-6 · Cited by 20
Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perceptionPreprint
Hird, E., Charalambous, C., El-Deredy, W., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/467738 · Cited by 8
Ritz, A., Weißmüller, K. S., Micacchi, L., & Gomezjurado, S. P. (2025) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.70047 · Cited by 5
“They shape individuals' attitudes and behaviors when making employment decisions (Atlas and Wager 2013) and guide individuals' interpretation of employment conditions under uncertainty.”
Marciano, D., Bellier, L., Mayer, I., Ruvalcaba, M., Lee, S., Hsu, M., & Knight, R. T. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05199-x · Cited by 2
Best, I., Breen, L. J., Kane, R. T., Egan, S. J., Collins, K. R. L., Somerville, S., & Rooney, R. M. (2022) · Clinical Psychologist · doi:10.1080/13284207.2022.2108694 · Cited by 2
Smoking Outcome Expectancies in Chinese Young Adults
Wang, Q. (2022) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2022.2101405 · Cited by 1
Friedl, P. (2025) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84881-0_5
Metadata
- Authors
- Atlas, L. Y., & Wager, T.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Venue
- Oxford Handbooks Online
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-12-01
- OpenAlex
- W223158437
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- expectancy, belief
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review