Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Body Mass Index, Cigarette Smoking, and Other Characteristics as Predictors of Self-Reported, Physician-Diagnosed Gallbladder Disease in Male College Alumni

Sahi, T., Paffenbarger, R. S., Hsieh, C.-c., Lee, I-M.·1998·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Despite the high prevalence of gallbladder disease in industrialized countries, little is known about the predictors of the disease, especially in men. The authors prospectively studied 16,785 alumni of Harvard University, aged 15-24 years, who were followed for up to 61 years. The health characteristics of these men were ascertained from their college entrance physical examination done in 1916-1950, and updated via mailed questionnaires in 1962 or 1966 (1962/1966). Alumni subsequently self-reported physician-diagnosed gallbladder disease on further mailed questionnaires in 1972 or 1977. Between college time and 1962/1966, 371 gallbladder disease cases occurred. An additional 314 cases occurred after 1962/1966. With respect to college characteristics, after adjustment for potential confounders, the authors found that body mass index (BMI), smoking, physical activity, blood pressure, and consumption of alcohol, coffee, or tea were unrelated to risk. However, BMI in 1962/1966 was directly related to risk of subsequent gallbladder disease, as was BMI gain since college (p, trend = 0.002 and 0.013, respectively). Compared with men with BMI or = 27.0 had a rate ratio of 2.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-4.66) for risk of contracting the disease. Men who gained > or = 6.0 BMI units since college had a rate ratio of 1.46 (95% CI 0.86-2.46) compared with men who gained -0.9 to +0.9 BMI units. Compared with never smokers, men who smoked pipes or cigars or < 1 pack of cigarettes…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009505

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cholesterol gallstones result from accumulation of cholesterol monohydrate crystals precipitating in gallbladder bile containing excess cholesterol as compared to bile salts and phospholipids.

    “The primary risk is the occurrence of cholesterol gallstones, which result from the accumulation of cholesterol monohydrate crystals precipitating in gallbladder bile containing excess cholesterol as compared to bile salts and phospholipids [18].”

    From Excess Body Weight and Gallstone Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Alterations of the ratio of cholesterol to bile salts within the gallbladder occur in weight fluctuations and rapid weight loss, reflecting increased hepatic cholesterol secretion and synthesis and reduced secretion of bile salts.

    “Alterations of the ratio of choles-DOI: 10.1159/000516418 terol to bile salts within the gallbladder were observed in the setting of weight fluctuations and in rapid weight loss [37], reflecting increased hepatic cholesterol secretion and synthesis as well as a reduced secretion of bile salts [18].”

    From Excess Body Weight and Gallstone Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sahi, T., Paffenbarger, R. S., Hsieh, C.-C., & Lee, I.-M.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1998-04-01
Volume
147
Issue
7
Pages
644-651
ISSN
  • 0002-9262
  • 1476-6256
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review