The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Confidence Limits Made Easy: Interval Estimation Using a Substitution Method
Abstract
The use of confidence intervals has become standard in the presentation of statistical results in medical journals. Calculation of confidence limits can be straightforward using the normal approximation with an estimate of the standard error, and in particular cases exact solutions can be obtained from published tables. However, for a number of commonly used measures in epidemiology and clinical research, formulae either are not available or are so complex that calculation is tedious. The author describes how an approach to confidence interval estimation which has been used in certain specific instances can be generalized to obtain a simple and easily understood method that has wide applicability. The technique is applicable as long as the measure for which a confidence interval is required can be expressed as a monotonic function of a single parameter for which the confidence limits are available. These known confidence limits are substituted into the expression for the measure--giving the required interval. This approach makes fewer distributional assumptions than the use of the normal approximation and can be more accurate. The author illustrates his technique by calculating confidence intervals for Levin's attributable risk, some measures in population genetics, and the "number needed to be treated" in a clinical trial. Hitherto the calculation of confidence intervals for these measures was quite problematic. The substitution method can provide a practical alternative to the use of complex formulae when performing interval estimation, and even in simpler situations it has major advantages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment
Laupacis, A., Sackett, D. L., & Roberts, R. S. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806303182605 · Cited by 1,681
Cited by
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia
Bhatt, D. L., Steg, P. G., Miller, M., Brinton, E. A., Jacobson, T. A., Ketchum, S. B., Doyle, R. T., Juliano, R. A., Jiao, L., Granowitz, C., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1812792 · Cited by 3,317
Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat.
Altman, D. G. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1309 · Cited by 938
Suurmond, R., van Rhee, H., & Hak, T. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1260 · Cited by 881
Understanding COVID-19 vaccine demand and hesitancy: A nationwide online survey in China
Lin, Y., Hu, Z., Zhao, Q., Alias, H., Danaee, M., & Wong, L. P. (2020) · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0008961 · Cited by 688
Rhinitis and onset of asthma: a longitudinal population-based study
Shaaban, R., Zureik, M., Soussan, D., Neukirch, C., Heinrich, J., Sunyer, J., Wjst, M., Cerveri, I., Pin, I., Bousquet, J., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61446-4 · Cited by 610
Metadata
- Authors
- Daly, L. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-04-15
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 783-790
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2122916891
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confidence Limits Made Easy: Interval Estimation Using a Substitution Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009523
- The paper
- Daly, L. E. (1998). Confidence Limits Made Easy: Interval Estimation Using a Substitution Method. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.