The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ADEQUACY OF SURVEY DATA COLLECTED FROM SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENTS
Abstract
This study examined interview data on personal habits (smoking, drinking and dietary histories) when collected from two sources. A sample of 300 pairs of subjects (mostly husbands and wives) was obtained from an ongoing health survey in Hawaii, and both members of each pair were interviewed separately about the habits of the husband. Care was taken that the members of each pair had no opportunity to communicate with each other between the start and completion of both interviews. The results showed remarkably good agreement in overall mean values between the two groups of respondents. In general, approximately 75% of the pairs agreed within acceptable limits on most items. There was no clear association of the degree of agreement within pairs with a variety of characteristics of the surrogate group, including age, race, level of education, family income, and duration of residence of proportion of meals eaten together with the subject. These findings are encouraging for the use of surrogate respondents in studies of personal habits where direct interviews are not always feasible, or where the use of such substitutes can improve the reppresentativeness and size of the sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pappas, G., Queen, S., Hadden, W., & Fisher, G. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199307083290207 · Cited by 1,524
Selection of Controls in Case-Control Studies
Wacholder, S., McLaughlin, J. K., Silverman, D. T., & Mandel, J. S. (1992) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116396 · Cited by 998
Validation of a dietary questionnaire with plasma carotenoid and α-tocopherol levels
Willett, W., Stampfer, M., Underwood, B., Speizer, F., Rosner, B., & Hennekens, C. (1983) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/38.4.631 · Cited by 273
Larkin, E. K., Smith, T. J., Stayner, L. T., ROSNER, B. A., Speizer, F. E., & Garshick, E. (2000) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/1097-0274(200010)38:4<399::aid-ajim5>3.0.co;2-d · Cited by 35
Bild, D. E., & Stevenson, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90087-4 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- KOLONEL, L. N., HIROHATA, T., & NOMURA, A. M. Y.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1977-12
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 476-484
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2262819019
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ADEQUACY OF SURVEY DATA COLLECTED FROM SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112494
- The paper
- KOLONEL, L. N., HIROHATA, T., & NOMURA, A. M. Y. (1977). ADEQUACY OF SURVEY DATA COLLECTED FROM SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENTS. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112494
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.