The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EPIDEMIOLOGIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO VARIETIES OF CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS1
Abstract
This report of the worldwide distribution of two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans was drawn from data on 628 clinical isolates and from data on 97 additional isolates from other laboratories. Tests showed that 100% of the cultures from Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Holland, Italy, Switzerland, and Japan belonged to C. neoformans var. neoformans. More than 85% of the isolates from Argentina, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States (except southern California) were of C. neoformans var. neoformans, the remainder being of C. neoformans var. gattii . There was an unusually high prevalence (35-100%) of C. neoformans var. gattii in Australia, Brazil, Cambodia, Hawaii, southern California, Mexico, Paraguay, Thailand, Vietnam, Nepal, and countries in central Africa. These findings indicated that C. neoformans var. gattii is prevalent only in tropical and subtropical regions. Seventy per cent of the total isolates studied were of serotype A of C. neoformans var. neoformans. Serotype D (9% of the total) was common in Europe, but was found infrequently in other regions. Among the two serotypes of C. neoformans var. gattii , serotype B was 4.5 times more prevalent than serotype C. The majority (88%) of type C isolates in our collection were from southern California.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cryptococcosis in the era of AIDS--100 years after the discovery of Cryptococcus neoformans
Mitchell, T. G., & Perfect, J. R. (1995) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.8.4.515 · Cited by 1,213
Regulatory circuitry governing fungal development, drug resistance, and disease.
Shapiro, R. S., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2011) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00045-10 · Cited by 576
Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis
Kwon-Chung, K. J., Fraser, J. A., Doering, T. L., Wang, Z. A., Janbon, G., Idnurm, A., & Bahn, Y.-S. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019760 · Cited by 531
Self-citationMirza, S. A., Phelan, M., Rimland, D., Graviss, E., Hamill, R., Brandt, M. E., Gardner, T., Sattah, M., Ponce de Leon, G., Baughman, W., et al. (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/368091 · Cited by 459
(2014) · doi:10.1128/cmr.00126-13 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- KWON-CHUNG, K. J., & BENNETT, J. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-130
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2105272521
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EPIDEMIOLOGIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO VARIETIES OF CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113861
- The paper
- KWON-CHUNG, K. J., & BENNETT, J. E. (1984). EPIDEMIOLOGIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO VARIETIES OF CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS1. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.