Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

EPIDEMIOLOGIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO VARIETIES OF CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS1

KWON-CHUNG, K. J., BENNETT, J. E.·1984·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

This report of the worldwide distribution of two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans was drawn from data on 628 clinical isolates and from data on 97 additional isolates from other laboratories. Tests showed that 100% of the cultures from Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Holland, Italy, Switzerland, and Japan belonged to C. neoformans var. neoformans. More than 85% of the isolates from Argentina, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States (except southern California) were of C. neoformans var. neoformans, the remainder being of C. neoformans var. gattii . There was an unusually high prevalence (35-100%) of C. neoformans var. gattii in Australia, Brazil, Cambodia, Hawaii, southern California, Mexico, Paraguay, Thailand, Vietnam, Nepal, and countries in central Africa. These findings indicated that C. neoformans var. gattii is prevalent only in tropical and subtropical regions. Seventy per cent of the total isolates studied were of serotype A of C. neoformans var. neoformans. Serotype D (9% of the total) was common in Europe, but was found infrequently in other regions. Among the two serotypes of C. neoformans var. gattii , serotype B was 4.5 times more prevalent than serotype C. The majority (88%) of type C isolates in our collection were from southern California.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113861

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
KWON-CHUNG, K. J., & BENNETT, J. E.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1984-07
Volume
120
Issue
1
Pages
123-130
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2105272521
Cited by
474
References
0
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EPIDEMIOLOGIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO VARIETIES OF CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113861
The paper
KWON-CHUNG, K. J., & BENNETT, J. E. (1984). EPIDEMIOLOGIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO VARIETIES OF CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS1. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113861

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.