The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SEVEN-DAY ACTIVITY AND SELF-REPORT COMPARED TO A DIRECT MEASURE OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
Abstract
To determine how well a seven-day interview-administered activity recall used in a large epidemiologic study at Stanford University reflected seven days of self-reported activity and directly measured physical activity, 30 white males, mean age 52 years, recorded daily physical activity for a week, and half of these wore an ambulatory solid-state minicomputer (Vitalog) which measures continuous heart rate and motion. Total hours of moderate, hard, and hard plus very hard activity were not significantly different for weekdays and weekends for self-report and recall and were significantly correlated. Total energy expenditure for subjects wearing the Vitalog averaged 38.5 +/- 6.7 kcal/kg/day compared to an average of 37.7 +/- 4.5 kcal/kg/day for recall or 39.6 +/- 7.2 kcal/kg/day for self-report. Conditioning activities are best remembered followed by home or leisure and job activities. Mean hours of sleep per week night were significantly greater reported by self-report than reported by recall, but the two were significantly correlated. It is concluded that a seven-day activity recall accurately reflects mean kcal/day expenditure, with conditioning activities being the best recalled. A self-report log used in conjunction with an interview-based seven-day recall might maximize accuracy of recall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prince, S. A., Adamo, K. B., Hamel, M., Hardt, J., Connor Gorber, S., & Tremblay, M. (2008) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-56 · Cited by 3,162
Exercise treatment for depression
Dunn, A. L., Trivedi, M. H., Kampert, J. B., Clark, C. G., & Chambliss, H. O. (2005) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.003 · Cited by 1,208
BLAIR, S. N., HASKELL, W. L., HO, P., PAFFENBARGER, R. S., VRANIZAN, K. M., FARQUHAR, J. W., & WOOD, P. D. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114163 · Cited by 1,104
Self-citationExercise for the Treatment of Depression
Knapen, J., Vancampfort, D., Schoubs, B., Probst, M., Sienaert, P., Haake, P., Peuskens, J., & Pieters, G. (2009) · The Open Complementary Medicine Journal · doi:10.2174/1876391x00901010078 · Cited by 911
Exercise training improves functional status in patients with peripheral arterial disease
Regensteiner, J. G., Steiner, J. F., & Hiatt, W. R. (1996) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0741-5214(05)80040-0 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- TAYLOR, C. B., COFFEY, T., BERRA, K., IAFFALDANO, R., CASEY, K., & HASKELL, W. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-12-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 818-824
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2078125563
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SEVEN-DAY ACTIVITY AND SELF-REPORT COMPARED TO A DIRECT MEASURE OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113954
- The paper
- TAYLOR, C. B., COFFEY, T., BERRA, K., IAFFALDANO, R., CASEY, K., & HASKELL, W. L. (1984). SEVEN-DAY ACTIVITY AND SELF-REPORT COMPARED TO A DIRECT MEASURE OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.