The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASSOCIATIONS WITH NUCLEAR, CORTICAL, AND POSTERIOR SUBCAPSULAR CATARACTS
Abstract
Data from the 1971-1972 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used to examine the associations between specific cataract types and age, race, sex, number of years spent in school, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, urban versus rural residence, and average daily ultraviolet spectrum B (UV-B) radiation counts at the site of examination. Separate comparisons were made of persons with no lens changes (n = 1,299) and persons with cortical (n = 55), nuclear (n = 104), and posterior subcapsular cataracts (n = 18). Persons with more than one type of cataract were excluded from the analysis. Cortical cataracts were associated with age (relative risk (RR) = 11.4 for age 70 years vs. age 50 years), race (RR = 3.5 for blacks vs. whites), sex (RR = 3.0 for women vs. men), educational achievement (RR = 1.8 for less than nine years of schooling vs. college), and UV-B count (RR = 3.6 for 6.0 X 10(3) counts vs. (2.6 X 10(3) counts). Nuclear cataracts were associated with age (RR = 38.6 for age 70 years vs. age 50 years), race (RR = 1.8 for black vs. white), and residence (RR = 1.6 for rural vs. urban). Posterior subcapsular cataracts were associated with diabetes (RR = 6.6 for diabetes present vs. diabetes absent) and systolic blood pressure (RR = 2.2 for 160 mmHg vs. 120 mmHg). Cortical cataracts were more common in women and more often found in locations with increased UV-B radiation counts than either nuclear or posterior subcapsular cataracts. In diabetics, the risk of posterior subcapsular cataracts was greater than the risk of nuclear cataracts (p less than 0.05) and also appeared to be greater than the risk of cortical cataracts (p = 0.06).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Racial differences in the elderly's use of medical procedures and diagnostic tests.
Escarce, J. J., Epstein, K. R., Colby, D. C., & Schwartz, J. S. (1993) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.83.7.948 · Cited by 332
India-US Case-Control Study of Age-Related Cataracts
Mohan, M. (1989) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010688028 · Cited by 309
Exposure to Sunlight and Other Risk Factors for Age-Related Macular Degeneration
West, S. K. (1989) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010897038 · Cited by 262
Comprehensive review of the effects of diabetes on ocular health
Skarbez, K., Priestley, Y., Hoepf, M., & Koevary, S. B. (2010) · Expert Review of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1586/eop.10.44 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- HILLER, R., SPERDUTO, R. D., & EDERER, F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 916-925
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W1769442413
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASSOCIATIONS WITH NUCLEAR, CORTICAL, AND POSTERIOR SUBCAPSULAR CATARACTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114481
- The paper
- HILLER, R., SPERDUTO, R. D., & EDERER, F. (1986). EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASSOCIATIONS WITH NUCLEAR, CORTICAL, AND POSTERIOR SUBCAPSULAR CATARACTS. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.