The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Longitudinal Study of Risk Factors for Depressive Symptomatology in Elderly Widowed and Married Women
Abstract
Few studies have examined whether risk factors for depressive symptomatology differ in bereaved and nonbereaved individuals or whether risk factors differ in bereaved individuals over time. Between 1979 and 1983 in Washington County, Maryland, the associations between various health and social network variables and depressive symptomatology were evaluated prior to bereavement and at 1 and 12 months after bereavement in 136 widows and 409 married controls. Prior Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale scores were generally a good predictor of subsequent scores; however, shortly after bereavement prior scores proved relatively uninformative as most widows experienced a marked increase in depressive symptomatology. Poor health and limitations in physical activity at baseline were consistently associated with higher levels of symptomatology. Although having more friends was also consistently associated with lower levels of symptomatology, the effect of family size appeared to be time and circumstance specific. These results suggest that women at risk of prolonged depression after the death of their husbands can be identified prior to or at the time of bereavement and that widows have risk factors similar to those of women at risk of depression in the general community.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“longitudinal studies of spousal bereavement in the general (noncaregiver) population that have shown that depression returns to baseline within 1-2 years postloss (35, 36);”
From Chronic stress and age-related increases in the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6. (2003) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–102 of 102
Honors and Awards * Bibliography of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
(2008) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwn247
Sachdev (1999) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199905)14:5
Metadata
- Authors
- Harlow, S. D., Goldberg, E. L., & Comstock, G. W.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Comstock, George W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-09-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 526-538
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2095652859
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (31257)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K06HL021670, HL 21670)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
- Keywords
- depressive symptoms, widowhood, bereavement, older women, risk factors, marital status, social networks, friends, family size, physical activity, health status, depression prediction, longitudinal change
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Bereavement, Depression, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Family Characteristics, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Marriage, Psychological Tests, Risk Factors, Single Person, Social Support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review