The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are Female Smokers at Higher Risk for Lung Cancer than Male Smokers?
Abstract
A case-control study of male-female differences in cigarette smoking and lung cancer was conducted during 1981-1985 in Toronto, St. Catharine's, and Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada. In total, 442 female and 403 male histologically verified cancer cases were individually matched by age and area of residence to each other and to 410 female and 362 male randomly selected population controls. Subjects were interviewed concerning their exposures to various life-style factors, and in particular, they received detailed questioning regarding their lifelong histories of usage of tobacco products. It was found that, for both sexes, a greatly elevated risk of developing lung cancer was associated with cigarette consumption, increasing with pack-years of cigarettes smoked and declining with duration of time since quitting smoking. Furthermore, the association was significantly (p = 0.010) and appreciably stronger for females than for males. At a history of 40 pack-years relative to lifelong nonsmoking, the odds ratio for women was 27.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.9-52.0) and that for men was 9.60 (95% CI 5.64-16.3). Higher odds ratios for females were also seen within each of the major histologic groupings. Thus, the higher elevated risk of lung cancer currently observed in other studies for female ever smokers compared with male ever smokers, while possibly attributable in part to greater smoking cessation among males, may be due to higher susceptibility among females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture
Parkin, D. M., Bray, F. I., & Devesa, S. S. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00267-2 · Cited by 2,169
The Effects of a Smoking Cessation Intervention on 14.5-Year Mortality: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Anthonisen, N. R., Skeans, M. A., Wise, R. A., Manfreda, J., Kanner, R. E., Connett, J. E., & for the Lung Health Study Research Group* (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00005 · Cited by 1,237
Differences in Lung Cancer Risk Between Men and Women: Examination of the Evidence
Zang, E. A., & Wynder, E. L. (1996) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/88.3-4.183 · Cited by 722
Effect of cigarette smoking on major histological types of lung cancer: a meta-analysis
Khuder, S. A. (2001) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00181-1 · Cited by 522
Higher Lung Cancer Incidence in Young Women Than Young Men in the United States
Jemal, A., Miller, K. D., Ma, J., Siegel, R. L., Fedewa, S. A., Islami, F., Devesa, S. S., & Thun, M. J. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1715907 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Risch, H. A., Howe, G. R., Jain, M., Burch, J. D., Holowaty, E. J., & Miller, A. B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 281-293
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2252688746
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Female Smokers at Higher Risk for Lung Cancer than Male Smokers? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116857
- The paper
- Risch, H. A., Howe, G. R., Jain, M., Burch, J. D., Holowaty, E. J., & Miller, A. B. (1993). Are Female Smokers at Higher Risk for Lung Cancer than Male Smokers? American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.