The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Magnetic Fields and Cancer in Children Residing Near Swedish High-voltage Power Lines
Abstract
A case-control study was conducted to test the hypothesis that exposure to magnetic fields of the type generated by high-voltage power lines increases cancer incidence in children. The study base consisted of everyone under age 16 years who had lived on a property located within 300 meters of any of the 220 and 400 kV power lines in Sweden during the period 1960-1985. Subjects were followed from their entry into the study base through 1985. A total of 142 cancer cases were identified through a record linkage to the Swedish Cancer Registry. There were 39 leukemia and 33 central nervous system tumor cases. A total of 558 controls were selected at random from the study base. Exposure was assessed by spot measurements and by calculations of the magnetic fields generated by the power lines, taking distance, line configuration, and load into account. Information about historical loads on the power lines was used to calculate the magnetic fields for the year closest in time to diagnosis. When historical calculations were used as exposure assessment for childhood leukemia with cutoff points at 0.1 and 0.2 microtesla (microT), the estimated relative risk increased over the two exposure levels and was estimated at 2.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-6.3) for 0.2 microT and over; p for trend = 0.02. When the upper cutoff point was shifted to 0.3 microT, the relative risk was 3.8 (95% CI 1.4-9.3); p for trend = 0.005. These results persisted when adjustment for potential confounding factors was made. For central nervous system tumor, lymphoma, and all childhood cancers combined, there was no support for an association.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multiple-bias modelling for analysis of observational data
Greenland, S. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.00349.x · Cited by 497
Brain and Other Central Nervous System Cancers: Recent Trends in Incidence and Mortality
Legler, J. M., Ries, L. A. G., Smith, M. A., Warren, J. L., Heineman, E. F., Kaplan, R. S., & Linet, M. S. (1999) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/91.16.1382 · Cited by 452
Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and Health.
Ahlbom, I. C., Cardis, E., Green, A., Linet, M., Savitz, D., Swerdlow, A., & ICNIRP (International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) Standing Committee on Epidemiology (2001) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.109-1240626 · Cited by 256
Greenland, S. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/01621450338861905 · Cited by 141
Panagopoulos, D., Karabarbounis, A., Yakymenko, I., & Chrousos, G. (2021) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.2021.5272 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Feychting, M., & Alhbom, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-10-01
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 467-481
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2171977230
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic Fields and Cancer in Children Residing Near Swedish High-voltage Power Lines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116881
- The paper
- Feychting, M., & Alhbom, M. (1993). Magnetic Fields and Cancer in Children Residing Near Swedish High-voltage Power Lines. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.