Cited by 53Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Hispanic Versus White Smoking Patterns by Sex and Level of Education

Winkleby, Marilyn A., Schooler, Caroline, Kraemer, Helena C., Lin, Jennifer, Fortmann, Stephen P.·1995·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Although past studies have compared cigarette smoking patterns in Hispanics and whites, few have examined differences within sex and educational subgroups. Data are presented for 1,088 Hispanic women and men (89% Mexican-American origin) and pairwise matched white women and men (544 pairs), aged 25-74 years, who participated in population-based cross-sectional surveys in California in 1979-1990. Each pair was matched on age, sex, educational level, city of residence, and survey time period. There were large differences in smoking prevalence rates between Hispanic and white pairs with low educational attainment. White women and men with less than a high school education were approximately twice as likely to be current daily cigarette smokers as were similarly educated Hispanic women and men (46.1 vs. 20.6% for women and 52.7 vs. 30.1% for men). As the level of education increased, these ethnic differences in smoking decreased and became negligible among those who completed college. Virtually all low-educated white men (92.5%) and most low-educated white women (73.1%) were either current or former daily smokers. There were large ethnic differences in rates of smoking cessation advice from a physician; only 8.3% of low-educated Hispanic men who were current daily smokers had ever been advised by a physician to stop smoking, compared with 59.6% of low-educated white men. These data confirm ethnic differences in smoking behavior and identify the high smoking rates of white men and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117649

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 53

Authors
Winkleby, M. A., Schooler, C., Kraemer, H. C., Lin, J., & Fortmann, S. P.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Winkleby, Marilyn A.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1995-08-15
Volume
142
Issue
4
Pages
410-418
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2112752065
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl021906-19)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1-RO1-HL-21906)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
cigarette smoking, Hispanic Americans, Mexican Americans, racial and ethnic differences, educational attainment, sex differences, smoking prevalence, smoking cessation counseling, physician counseling, tobacco use prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, California, Educational Status, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Logistic Models, Matched-Pair Analysis, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review