Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE VIRUS WATCH PROGRAM: A CONTINUING SURVEILLANCE OF VIRAL INFECTIONS IN METROPOLITAN NEW YORK FAMILIES

FOX, JOHN P., BRANDT, CARL D., WASSERMANN, FELIX E., HALL, CARRIE E., SPIGLAND, ILYA, KOGON, ALFRED, ELVEBACK, LILA R.·1969·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Virus Watch (VW) data on adenovirus isolations were reviewed together with newly available serologic results. This permitted classifying persons shedding virus as newly infected (143 persons) or recrudescent excretors (105 persons) and detection of 45 new infections not revealed by isolations. Mode of excretion after new infection varied with virus type, the per cent excreting only fecally being 49 with type 2, 67 with types 1 and 5, and 77 with other types. Combined respiratory and fecal excretion was related to young age and to illness. Two classes of infection were recognized, unrelated to adenovirus type: 1) abortive, resulting in brief excretion and little or no illness; and 2) persistent, resulting frequently in illness and characterized by long continued intermittent (recrudescent) excretion. Persistent infection resulted in prolonged intra-familial spread but its implication to health is unknown. Seroconversion was demonstrated in 75% of new infections studied. Serologic methods, in decreasing order of sensitivity, were neutralization, hemagglutination-inhibtion (HI), and complement fixation (CF). Both CF and HI antibodies were long persistent. Surveillance based on virus isolations from index members of families revealed 79% of infections in index persons and 64% of household invasions. Infections occurred throughout the year but were least frequent in the summer. Type 2 was continuously present and by far the most abundant although type 1 may have predominated before the VW began. The only sharp outbreak was due to type 5. Virus spread within households progressed slowly and was sharply and inversely related to age. Of all new adenovirus infections 45% were illness-associated (43% for type 2 and 59% for type 5). These figures are believed to closely reflect the true pathogenicity of adenoviruses. Their estimated contribution to all infectious illness was 2.4% (4.5% in infants) and to febrile illness was 77% (10.6% in infants).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120913

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
FOX, J. P., BRANDT, C. D., WASSERMANN, F. E., HALL, C. E., SPIGLAND, I., KOGON, A., & ELVEBACK, L. R.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1969-01
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
25-50
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W1845789524
Cited by
285
References
0
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE VIRUS WATCH PROGRAM: A CONTINUING SURVEILLANCE OF VIRAL INFECTIONS IN METROPOLITAN NEW YORK FAMILIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120913
The paper
FOX, J. P., BRANDT, C. D., WASSERMANN, F. E., HALL, C. E., SPIGLAND, I., KOGON, A., & ELVEBACK, L. R. (1969). THE VIRUS WATCH PROGRAM: A CONTINUING SURVEILLANCE OF VIRAL INFECTIONS IN METROPOLITAN NEW YORK FAMILIES. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120913

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.