The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE VIRUS WATCH PROGRAM: A CONTINUING SURVEILLANCE OF VIRAL INFECTIONS IN METROPOLITAN NEW YORK FAMILIES
Abstract
Virus Watch (VW) data on adenovirus isolations were reviewed together with newly available serologic results. This permitted classifying persons shedding virus as newly infected (143 persons) or recrudescent excretors (105 persons) and detection of 45 new infections not revealed by isolations. Mode of excretion after new infection varied with virus type, the per cent excreting only fecally being 49 with type 2, 67 with types 1 and 5, and 77 with other types. Combined respiratory and fecal excretion was related to young age and to illness. Two classes of infection were recognized, unrelated to adenovirus type: 1) abortive, resulting in brief excretion and little or no illness; and 2) persistent, resulting frequently in illness and characterized by long continued intermittent (recrudescent) excretion. Persistent infection resulted in prolonged intra-familial spread but its implication to health is unknown. Seroconversion was demonstrated in 75% of new infections studied. Serologic methods, in decreasing order of sensitivity, were neutralization, hemagglutination-inhibtion (HI), and complement fixation (CF). Both CF and HI antibodies were long persistent. Surveillance based on virus isolations from index members of families revealed 79% of infections in index persons and 64% of household invasions. Infections occurred throughout the year but were least frequent in the summer. Type 2 was continuously present and by far the most abundant although type 1 may have predominated before the VW began. The only sharp outbreak was due to type 5. Virus spread within households progressed slowly and was sharply and inversely related to age. Of all new adenovirus infections 45% were illness-associated (43% for type 2 and 59% for type 5). These figures are believed to closely reflect the true pathogenicity of adenoviruses. Their estimated contribution to all infectious illness was 2.4% (4.5% in infants) and to febrile illness was 77% (10.6% in infants).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Studies of the community and family: acute respiratory illness and infection
Monto, A. S. (1994) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036158 · Cited by 213
Li, H., Lasaro, M. O., Jia, B., Lin, S. W., Haut, L. H., High, K. A., & Ertl, H. C. (2011) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2011.81 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- FOX, J. P., BRANDT, C. D., WASSERMANN, F. E., HALL, C. E., SPIGLAND, I., KOGON, A., & ELVEBACK, L. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1969-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-50
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W1845789524
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE VIRUS WATCH PROGRAM: A CONTINUING SURVEILLANCE OF VIRAL INFECTIONS IN METROPOLITAN NEW YORK FAMILIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120913
- The paper
- FOX, J. P., BRANDT, C. D., WASSERMANN, F. E., HALL, C. E., SPIGLAND, I., KOGON, A., & ELVEBACK, L. R. (1969). THE VIRUS WATCH PROGRAM: A CONTINUING SURVEILLANCE OF VIRAL INFECTIONS IN METROPOLITAN NEW YORK FAMILIES. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120913
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.