Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dry-matter Production by Pinus sylvestris L.

OVINGTON, J. D.·1957·Annals of Botany

Abstract

This paper contains the data for the gross weight and relative proportions of canopy, bole, and roots in a series of twelve even-aged forest stands. From these it is possible to describe the growth curves of trees of Pinus sylvestris in Britain under the observed conditions and the production of dry matter per unit area of such stands of trees. The following general results are given: regressions relating weight to bole, height, and diameter; the relative growth of leaves, roots, and bole; annual increments of dry matter; relative growth-rates per unit leaf area or per unit dry weight per annum. Some comparative data are given for Pinus nigra (one plantation) which is more productive than Pinus sylvestris.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083565

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
OVINGTON, J. D.
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
1957-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
287-314
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2209626904
Cited by
215
References
0
FWCI
31.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dry-matter Production by Pinus sylvestris L. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083565
The paper
OVINGTON, J. D. (1957). Dry-matter Production by Pinus sylvestris L. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083565

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.